Skip to content

CA Foundation · Business Economics · Public Finance

Which of the following best describes a 'merit good' in the context of public finance?

A merit good is one that society feels everyone should have irrespective of ability to pay, such as education or health care. Markets tend to under-provide it, so governments subsidise or supply it directly. A non-rival, non-excludable good is a public good instead.

  1. AA good that is non-rival and non-excludable in consumption
  2. BA good that society believes everyone should have regardless of ability to pay, and which the market tends to under-provideCorrect
  3. CA good whose consumption imposes harm on third parties
  4. DA good supplied only by a monopoly firm

Explanation

Merit goods such as education and immunisation are considered desirable for all, and left to the market they are under-consumed, so the government subsidises or provides them. Option A describes a pure public good, not a merit good. Option C describes a demerit good or negative externality.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Public Finance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Public Finance questions