Corporate and Economic Laws · Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
FEMA 1999: Introduction, Objectives and Key Definitions
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
FEMA 1999 is the Indian law that governs foreign exchange dealings. It extends to the whole of India and applies to branches and offices outside India owned or controlled by residents. To solve questions, classify the person as resident or not, the transaction as current or capital account, then apply the definition and the Section 3 or 4 rule.
Understand FEMA 1999: Introduction, Objectives and Definitions
The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) came into force on 1 June 2000. Section 1 says it extends to the whole of India. It also applies to all branches, offices and agencies outside India owned or controlled by a person resident in India. It covers any contravention committed outside India by a person to whom the Act applies.
FEMA replaced the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA). The shift in approach is the usual theory question. FERA was built to conserve and regulate foreign exchange and was control-oriented. FEMA is built to facilitate external trade and payments and to promote the orderly development and maintenance of the foreign exchange market in India. Treat this as the headline objective statement; the supplied Act text here does not carry a preamble, so write it in your own words.
The structure of the law is simple. Section 3 bars dealing in foreign exchange except through an authorised person, unless the Act, rules, regulations or RBI permission say otherwise. Section 4 bars a resident from holding foreign exchange, foreign security or immovable property outside India, again save as the Act provides. Current account transactions are freer; capital account transactions are regulated under Section 6.
Everything depends on definitions in Section 2. The most tested are person resident in India, foreign exchange, authorised person, capital account transaction and current account transaction. Learn the wording closely. Examiners change one fact in a case and expect you to see how the classification changes.
Key rules to remember
- Short title, extent, application (Section 1)
- Extends to the whole of India; applies also to branches, offices and agencies outside India owned or controlled by a person resident in India, and to contraventions outside India by persons to whom the Act applies
- Commenced on 1 June 2000 by notification dated 1 May 2000. Different dates may be appointed for different provisions.
- Person resident in India (Section 2(v))
- (i) person residing in India for more than 182 days during the preceding financial year (with exclusions); (ii) any person or body corporate registered or incorporated in India; (iii) office, branch or agency in India owned or controlled by a person resident outside India; (iv) office, branch or agency outside India owned or controlled by a person resident in India
- The 182-day test applies to individuals and uses the preceding financial year. The test is 'more than' 182 days.
- Exclusions from the 182-day limb
- Excluded: person who has gone out of or stays outside India for taking up employment, for carrying on a business or vocation outside India, or for any other purpose indicating intention to stay outside India for an uncertain period. Also excluded: person who has come to or stays in India otherwise than for employment, business or vocation in India, or other purpose indicating intention to stay for an uncertain period
- So intention matters. Days alone do not decide residence.
- Person resident outside India (Section 2(w))
- A person who is not resident in India
- It is a residual definition.
- Authorised person (Section 2(c))
- Authorised dealer, money changer, off-shore banking unit or any other person authorised under Section 10(1) to deal in foreign exchange or foreign securities
- Section 3(a) bars dealing with anyone who is not an authorised person.
- Foreign exchange (Section 2(n))
- Foreign currency, plus deposits, credits and balances payable in foreign currency, plus drafts, travellers cheques, letters of credit or bills of exchange expressed in Indian currency but payable in foreign currency, plus those drawn by banks, institutions or persons outside India but payable in Indian currency
- Foreign currency means any currency other than Indian currency (Section 2(m)).
- Capital account transaction (Section 2(e))
- A transaction which alters the assets or liabilities, including contingent liabilities, outside India of persons resident in India, or assets or liabilities in India of persons resident outside India
- It includes transactions referred to in Section 6(3).
- Current account transaction (Section 2(j))
- A transaction other than a capital account transaction; includes payments for foreign trade, business, services and short-term banking and credit; interest on loans and net income from investments; remittances for living expenses of parents, spouse and children abroad; expenses for foreign travel, education and medical care of parents, spouse and children
- It is defined by exclusion, so first test whether it is a capital account transaction.
- Export and import (Section 2(l), 2(p))
- Export: taking goods out of India to a place outside India, or providing services from India to a person outside India. Import: bringing any goods or services into India
- Both cover goods and services.
- Person (Section 2(u))
- Includes individual, HUF, company, firm, AOP or BOI (incorporated or not), every artificial juridical person, and any agency, office or branch owned or controlled by such person
- The definition is inclusive, so it is wide.
- Section 4 rule on holding
- Save as otherwise provided in the Act, no person resident in India shall acquire, hold, own, possess or transfer any foreign exchange, foreign security or immovable property situated outside India
- Section 6(4) permits holding where the asset was acquired or held while resident outside India, or inherited from a person resident outside India.
How to solve FEMA 1999: Introduction, Objectives and Definitions questions
Use this order for any FEMA introduction or definition question, theory or case-based.
- 1Identify what is asked: extent and application, objectives or FERA contrast, a definition, or classification of a person or transaction.
- 2For a person, test residence. For an individual, check days in India in the preceding financial year, then the exclusions based on purpose and intention. For a company, firm or body, check whether it is registered or incorporated in India.
- 3For an office, branch or agency, check where it sits and who owns or controls it. This decides limbs (iii) and (iv) of Section 2(v).
- 4For a transaction, ask whether it alters assets or liabilities outside India of a resident, or in India of a non-resident. If yes, it is a capital account transaction. If not, it is a current account transaction.
- 5For a payment or receipt, check whether an authorised person is involved. Then apply Section 3 or Section 4, noting the 'save as otherwise provided' exceptions.
- 6Quote the exact definition wording and name the section only where you are sure of it.
- 7Conclude in one line: resident or not, current or capital, permitted or prohibited.
Quickest way: Residence and transaction classification in 60 seconds
When to use it: Use it for MCQs and short case facts where you must label a person or transaction fast.
- Company, firm or body registered in India: resident. Done.
- Foreign entity's office in India: resident. Indian entity's office abroad: resident.
- Individual: more than 182 days in the preceding financial year, then check whether he left India for employment, business or an uncertain stay. If so, not resident.
- Transaction: does it change assets or liabilities abroad or in India across the border? Yes means capital account. No means current account.
- Dealing in foreign exchange with a non-authorised person: Section 3(a) problem unless permitted.
Common mistakes in FEMA 1999: Introduction, Objectives and Definitions
Treating 182 days or more as the test.
Students blend this with other residence rules they know.
Fix: Write 'more than 182 days during the preceding financial year', exactly as in Section 2(v)(i).
Deciding residence only on days spent in India.
The exclusions in sub-clauses (A) and (B) are skipped.
Fix: After the day count, check the purpose of stay: employment, business or vocation, or an intention to stay for an uncertain period.
Saying a foreign company's Indian branch is a non-resident.
Students look at the owner's residence and ignore limb (iii).
Fix: An office, branch or agency in India owned or controlled by a non-resident is itself a person resident in India.
Calling Section 1 application limited to India's territory.
The words 'extends to the whole of India' are remembered, but sub-section (3) is forgotten.
Fix: Add that the Act applies to branches, offices and agencies outside India owned or controlled by a resident, and to contraventions outside India by persons to whom it applies.
Classifying education or medical expenses abroad as capital account.
Large foreign remittances feel like capital movements.
Fix: Section 2(j)(iv) lists expenses for foreign travel, education and medical care of parents, spouse and children as current account transactions.
Stating FEMA as a criminal-control law like FERA.
Students rely on memory of FERA's tough reputation.
Fix: Contrast clearly: FERA was about conservation and control; FEMA is about facilitating external trade and payments and managing the foreign exchange market.
Worked examples
Example 1
Ravi Menon, an Indian citizen, was in India for 200 days in the financial year 2025-26. In June 2026 he left India to take up employment in Dubai. Is he a person resident in India for the purposes of FEMA in 2026-27? Answer with reasons.
Show the solution
- Section 2(v)(i) first test: residing in India for more than 182 days during the preceding financial year. For 2026-27 the preceding year is 2025-26. 200 days is more than 182, so the day test is met.
- Next check the exclusions. A person who has gone out of India or stays outside India for or on taking up employment outside India is excluded.
- Ravi left India to take up employment in Dubai. This fits exclusion (A)(a).
- Hence he does not qualify as a person resident in India under limb (i). None of the other limbs applies to an individual.
- Under Section 2(w), a person who is not resident in India is a person resident outside India.
Answer: Ravi is not a person resident in India; he is a person resident outside India, because he went out of India to take up employment abroad, despite staying more than 182 days in the preceding year.
Example 2
Classify each as current or capital account transaction under FEMA: (a) payment by an Indian company to a foreign supplier for imported goods; (b) a resident Indian buying immovable property in London; (c) remittance by Sunita for the education expenses of her son studying in Germany.
Show the solution
- Test (a): payment due in connection with foreign trade falls in Section 2(j)(i). It is a current account transaction.
- Test (b): buying property outside India alters the assets outside India of a person resident in India. Section 2(e) makes it a capital account transaction. Section 4 also restricts a resident from acquiring such property, save as the Act provides.
- Test (c): expenses for education of children are listed in Section 2(j)(iv). It is a current account transaction.
Answer: (a) current account; (b) capital account; (c) current account.
Exam tips
- Learn the wording of Section 2(v) closely. Case questions change one fact, such as days, purpose or ownership of a branch.
- In theory answers, give three parts for Section 1: extent, application to offices outside India, and commencement on 1 June 2000.
- For FERA versus FEMA, write a two-column comparison on objective and approach, and avoid unverified details such as the number of sections.
- In MCQs, check 'more than 182 days' and 'preceding financial year' before choosing an option.
- Always tie a transaction label to the definition: current account is the residual category, so test capital account first.
Practice questions from Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
- Under Section 47 of FEMA, the Reserve Bank may make regulations on which of the following matters specifically listed in the section?
- Under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, which of the following correctly describes the territorial application of the Act as regard…
- Which of the following is NOT among the matters on which the Reserve Bank may make regulations under Section 47(2) of FEMA, 1999, as per the…
- Which of the following is covered by the Explanation's definition of 'financial transaction' for section 3(d) of FEMA?
- Section 8 of FEMA requires a person resident in India, to whom foreign exchange is due or has accrued, to take all reasonable steps to reali…
FEMA 1999: Introduction, Objectives and Definitions: frequently asked questions
What is the extent and application of FEMA under Section 1?
FEMA extends to the whole of India. It also applies to all branches, offices and agencies outside India owned or controlled by a person resident in India, and to contraventions committed outside India by any person to whom the Act applies. It came into force on 1 June 2000.
Who is a person resident in India under FEMA?
An individual who resided in India for more than 182 days during the preceding financial year is resident, subject to exclusions for those who left or stay outside India for employment, business or an uncertain stay. Any person or body corporate registered or incorporated in India is also resident. So are offices, branches or agencies in India owned or controlled by non-residents, and those outside India owned or controlled by residents.
What is the main difference between FERA and FEMA?
FERA was a regulation and conservation law focused on control. FEMA aims to facilitate external trade and payments and to promote orderly development of the foreign exchange market in India. FEMA also distinguishes current account transactions from capital account transactions.
Who is an authorised person under FEMA?
Under Section 2(c), an authorised person is an authorised dealer, money changer, off-shore banking unit or any other person authorised under Section 10(1) to deal in foreign exchange or foreign securities. Section 3 generally prohibits dealing in foreign exchange with anyone who is not an authorised person.