Skip to content

CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Tax Planning and Location of Business

A company sets up a shell subsidiary in a low-tax jurisdiction with no staff, premises or business activity, only to book profits there and obtain a tax benefit. If the arrangement is declared an impermissible avoidance arrangement, which consequence is expressly permitted under the Income-tax Act, 2025?

The Act permits treating the residence of a party or the situs of an asset or transaction at a place other than that shown in the arrangement. Closure of the entity and automatic prosecution are not listed consequences, and the consequences are not limited to foreign tax.

  1. ATreating the place of residence of the party or the situs of the transaction at a place other than that shown in the arrangementCorrect
  2. BMandatory closure of the subsidiary
  3. CAutomatic prosecution of all directors
  4. DDisallowance of only the tax paid abroad, with no other consequences

Explanation

The consequences listed include treating the residence of any party, or the situs of an asset or transaction, at a place other than that provided under the arrangement. The list is not exhaustive, but closure of the entity and automatic prosecution are not listed. Limiting the consequence to foreign tax is wrong because the consequences are broader.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Tax Planning and Location of Business shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Tax Planning and Location of Business questions