CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Relief and Remedies
A High Court is hearing an application by Ms. Neha Iyer, a company secretary of Ganga Foods Ltd., for relief from liability for a compliance default. The court is inclined to excuse her partly. Before granting any relief, what must the court do under the Companies Act, 2013?
The court must first serve notice on the Registrar and any other person it thinks necessary, requiring them to show cause why relief should not be granted. Section 463(3) makes this a precondition to any relief under sub-section (1) or (2), in the manner the court specifies.
- AObtain a certificate of good conduct from the ICSI
- BServe notice requiring the Registrar and any other necessary persons to show cause why relief should not be grantedCorrect
- CWait for the Registrar to file a prosecution complaint first
- DObtain the prior consent of the Central Government
Explanation
Section 463(3) bars any court from granting relief under sub-section (1) or (2) unless it has, by notice served in the manner it specifies, required the Registrar and such other persons as it thinks necessary to show cause why relief should not be granted. No ICSI certificate, prosecution complaint or Central Government consent is required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Relief and Remedies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Relief and Remedies questions
- Before granting relief to an officer of Deccan Cables Ltd under the court's power to excuse honest and reasonable officers, the court wants …
- Mr. Sameer Khanna, a director of Deccan Metals Ltd., is prosecuted in a criminal proceeding for breach of duty. The court is satisfied he ac…
- Mr. Arvind Rao, a director of Kaveri Textiles Ltd., learns that a shareholder is likely to sue him for breach of duty over an inventory writ…
- Meera Shah, company secretary of Ganga Foods Ltd, applies to the High Court under Section 463(2) for relief over an apprehended claim. The c…
- Arvind, a company secretary and officer of Sagar Chemicals Ltd, learns that shareholders are likely to sue him for breach of duty over a del…
- The Central Government forms the opinion that Mr. Rohit Bansal, who manages Lotus Agro Ltd, has run its business with intent to defraud cred…