CA Final · Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation · Latest Developments in International Taxation
Kaveri Tech Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, belongs to a foreign MNE group. Its constituent entities hold a Master File and Country-by-Country reporting obligations apply. The group's consolidated revenue in the preceding accounting year was well above the CbC threshold of EUR 750 million (in the parent's jurisdiction). Which statement about the Indian CbCR regime is correct?
An Indian constituent entity of a foreign-parented group may have to furnish the CbC report if the parent is not required to file, the parent's jurisdiction lacks an exchange arrangement or has systemic failure, and no alternate reporting entity is designated. It applies only to large groups and does not replace Form 3CEB.
- ACbC report is filed by every Indian company regardless of group size
- BAn Indian constituent entity of a foreign group may need to furnish the report if the parent is not required to file, or the parent's jurisdiction has no exchange arrangement, and the group designates no alternate reporting entityCorrect
- CCbC report replaces the Transfer Pricing accountant's report
- DCbC reporting applies only to Indian parent companies of resident groups
Explanation
Under section 286, an Indian constituent entity of an international group whose parent is non-resident must furnish the CbC report where the parent is not obliged to file in its jurisdiction, there is no effective exchange arrangement, or there has been a systemic failure, and no alternate reporting entity is designated. It applies to groups above the threshold, not to all companies, and does not replace Form 3CEB.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Latest Developments in International Taxation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Latest Developments in International Taxation questions
- Case: Bluepeak Inc, a foreign company with no presence in India, sells software subscriptions through its website to Indian users and earns …
- Zenith Retail Ltd, an Indian company, wants to know how its Indian tax position would change if a global minimum tax regime (Pillar Two of t…
- Case: Mehta Exports Ltd, an Indian company, borrowed Rs 20 crore from its non-resident parent, which holds 100% of its equity. Interest paid…
- Case: Kaveri Ltd, an Indian company, has a subsidiary in a low-tax country. The group is within the scope of GloBE rules. In a jurisdiction,…
- Pillar Two GloBE rules apply to multinational enterprise groups whose consolidated revenue meets a specified threshold. Meridian Foods Group…
- Case: Rangoli Textiles Ltd, an Indian company, is a constituent entity of a multinational group headquartered in Singapore. The group's cons…