FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Measures of Financial Risk
Over 250 trading days, a bank's one-day 99% VaR model is exceeded on 8 days. Assuming the model is correctly calibrated, how many exceptions would be expected, and what does the result suggest?
A correctly calibrated 99% model would be expected to produce 2.5 exceptions in 250 days. Observing 8 is considerably higher, suggesting the VaR model may be underestimating risk rather than being conservative.
- A2.5 expected; the observed count is above expectation, suggesting VaR may be understatedCorrect
- B2.5 expected; the observed count is below expectation, suggesting VaR is overstated
- C8 expected; the model is perfectly calibrated
- D25 expected; the model is overly conservative
Explanation
Expected exceptions = 1% × 250 = 2.5. Observing 8 is well above this, which indicates the model may underestimate risk. The other options give wrong expected counts or reverse the direction.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measures of Financial Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measures of Financial Risk questions
- A coherent risk measure rho is applied to portfolio losses. A portfolio's risk is rho(X) = 8 million. A risk-free cash amount of 3 million i…
- A portfolio's one-day portfolio returns are normally distributed with mean zero and a standard deviation of 1.5%. The portfolio value is USD…
- A risk committee compares VaR and expected shortfall for two portfolios, A and B, whose combined position is the sum of the two. Which state…
- Which statement about estimating VaR and expected shortfall (ES) from a finite sample is most accurate?
- Daily portfolio returns are normally distributed with mean zero and a standard deviation of 1.5%. The portfolio value is USD 80 million. Usi…
- A risk manager is comparing Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) at the 97.5% confidence level for a portfolio. Which statement a…