CMA Final · Corporate Financial Reporting · Impairment of Assets (Ind AS 36)
Paragraphs 91-95 are retained as numbers in Ind AS 36. What is the position of these paragraphs?
Paragraphs 91-95 already appear as 'Deleted' in IAS 36, so Ind AS 36 keeps the paragraph numbers only to remain consistent with IAS 36's numbering. They do not contain Indian rules, Ind AS 113 changes or transitional provisions.
- AThey appear as 'Deleted' in IAS 36, and the numbers are retained for consistencyCorrect
- BThey contain Indian-specific impairment rules
- CThey were deleted due to Ind AS 113
- DThey deal with transitional provisions
Explanation
The appendix states that paragraphs 91-95 appear as 'Deleted' in IAS 36, and the numbering is retained in Ind AS 36 to stay consistent. They carry no Indian-specific rules. Ind AS 113 relates to paragraphs 25-27, and transitional paragraphs are 138-140K.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Impairment of Assets (Ind AS 36) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Impairment of Assets (Ind AS 36) questions
- Tara Ltd's cost-model asset was bought for ₹100 lakh with a 10-year life, nil residual value, straight line. At the end of year 4 carrying a…
- Paragraphs 103, 137 and C9 of Appendix C of Ind AS 36 are shown as deleted. What is the common reason given in the comparison with IAS 36?
- Which of the following sets correctly lists the paragraphs of Ind AS 36 deleted because they referred to Illustrative Examples that are not …
- A CMA candidate notes that paragraphs 25-27 and paragraph 5(b) of IAS 36 do not appear with content in Ind AS 36. According to the official …
- Meera Ltd. has a plant with carrying amount Rs 80 lakh after an impairment loss of Rs 20 lakh recognised two years ago; the original depreci…
- A cash-generating unit of Kaveri Ltd has these carrying amounts: goodwill ₹20 lakh, plant ₹60 lakh, building ₹40 lakh, total ₹120 lakh. Reco…