CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Risk Management
Sagar Foods Ltd. has a risk management policy listing mitigation plans, but the board has never reviewed whether the planned actions were carried out. Which governance gap does this chiefly show?
The gap is the absence of monitoring and review of risk treatment. Mitigation plans exist on paper, but the board has not checked whether they were implemented or effective. Good risk governance requires periodic review of treatment actions and reporting on their status.
- AAbsence of monitoring and review of risk treatment implementationCorrect
- BExcess risk appetite
- CIncorrect risk identification
- DOver-reliance on risk avoidance
Explanation
Having mitigation plans is not enough; the board and risk committee must monitor whether actions are implemented and effective. The facts say nothing about identification errors or appetite, so the gap is in monitoring and review.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Management questions
- Ganga Steels Ltd estimates a furnace failure risk has an inherent score of 20. Existing controls such as preventive maintenance reduce the e…
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd adopts the COSO ERM approach. Its board first reviews how the company's governance, culture and mission influence the way …
- Meghna Pharma Ltd. has set a climate risk appetite in which it will not invest in any new capacity with emissions intensity above a stated l…
- Under the Companies Act, 2013 framework, Arvind Engineering Ltd's board is preparing its report. Which of the following correctly states how…
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd's board finds that each department maintains its own risk list, with no common risk language, no aggregate view and no lin…
- Ganga Steels Ltd. buys a fire and business-interruption policy for its plant and also enters forward contracts for its dollar payables. The …