CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 24 Related Party Disclosures
Sagar Textiles Ltd's management is preparing its related party note. A statute governing one of its regulated dealings prohibits the company from revealing details of that dealing with a related party. How does Ind AS 24, as notified in India, treat this situation?
Under Ind AS 24 as notified in India, disclosures that conflict with confidentiality requirements of a statute or regulation need not be made. An accounting standard cannot override legal or regulatory requirements, so Sagar Textiles is not required to disclose that restricted dealing.
- AThe disclosures that conflict with the statutory confidentiality requirement are not required to be made, because an accounting standard cannot override legal or regulatory requirementsCorrect
- BThe disclosures must still be made in full, because the Ind AS overrides any statute on confidentiality
- CThe disclosures must be made only in the auditor's report and not in the financial statements
- DThe disclosures must be made in the financial statements but with the counterparty name replaced by a code
Explanation
The comparison with IAS 24 notes that in Ind AS 24 disclosures which conflict with confidentiality requirements of statute or regulations are not required, since accounting standards cannot override legal or regulatory requirements. Hence the option that insists on full disclosure is wrong because it ignores this carve-out.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 24 Related Party Disclosures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 24 Related Party Disclosures questions
- Vindhya Power Ltd has many small, similar transactions with an associate. The finance head proposes combining them into one figure per categ…
- Ind AS 24 states a reason why related party disclosures are required. Which statement best reflects that reason as given in the standard tex…
- Konkan Ports Ltd is controlled by Arya Holdings Ltd. Konkan had no transactions with Arya during the year. The accountant says no disclosure…
- Gomti Pharma Ltd's audit committee asks why Ind AS 24 requires disclosure of transactions, outstanding balances including commitments, and r…
- Pinnacle Steel Ltd is controlled by Rathi Infra Ltd, but they carry out no transactions with each other this year. The auditor asks whether …
- Vindhya Power Ltd has deputed three engineers to its associate under an arrangement whereby the associate pays for their services. The accou…