Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management

Several of a bank's trading, credit and ALM models rely on the same vendor's curve-construction library. A bug is discovered in the library. Which aggregation concern does this best illustrate?

This illustrates concentration or common-factor dependency: one shared vendor library creates a single point of failure, so a bug propagates across many models at once. Aggregate model risk assessment must account for such correlated errors rather than treating each model as independent.

  1. AConcentration and common-factor dependency, where one vendor error propagates across multiple modelsCorrect
  2. BModel drift caused by changes in market regime
  3. COverfitting in the bank's internal development process
  4. DBenchmarking bias from using an inappropriate peer model

Explanation

A single shared vendor component creates a common point of failure, so errors are correlated across models. This is a concentration or common-dependency issue central to aggregating model risk. The other options describe different problems not driven by a shared component.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management questions