Skip to content

CMA Final · Strategic Financial Management · Evaluation of Risky Proposals for Investment Decisions

Shree Textiles is evaluating a project with an initial outlay of Rs 50 lakh. Its expected annual cash inflow is Rs 20 lakh for 3 years under a risk-free scenario. The firm uses a certainty equivalent coefficient of 0.80 for all years, and the risk-free rate is 10%. The PV annuity factor at 10% for 3 years is 2.487. What is the NPV using the certainty equivalent approach?

The NPV is Rs -10.208 lakh. Each year's cash flow is reduced to its certain equivalent of Rs 16 lakh (20 x 0.80), discounted at the risk-free rate using the annuity factor 2.487 to get Rs 39.792 lakh, and the Rs 50 lakh outlay is subtracted.

  1. ARs -10.208 lakhCorrect
  2. BRs -0.208 lakh
  3. CRs 9.740 lakh
  4. DRs -2.208 lakh

Explanation

Certainty equivalent cash flow = 20 x 0.80 = 16 lakh per year. PV = 16 x 2.487 = 39.792 lakh. NPV = 39.792 - 50 = -10.208 lakh. Rs 9.740 lakh is wrong because it discounts the uncertain flows 20 x 2.487 = 49.74 and then subtracts 40 instead of 50 (outlay mistake). Rs -0.208 lakh comes from using the unadjusted flows (49.74 - 50 = -0.26), so not the answer either.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Evaluation of Risky Proposals for Investment Decisions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Evaluation of Risky Proposals for Investment Decisions questions