FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Regression Diagnostics
Two models explain bond spread changes using n = 54 observations. Model A has 3 explanatory variables and R-squared of 0.60. Model B adds 2 more explanatory variables and has R-squared of 0.61. Using adjusted R-squared = 1 - (1 - R^2)(n-1)/(n-k-1), which statement is correct?
Model A has the higher adjusted R-squared. Model A gives 1 minus 0.40 times 53/50, or 0.576, while Model B gives 1 minus 0.39 times 53/48, or about 0.569. The small gain in R-squared does not offset the penalty for two extra variables.
- AModel A has the higher adjusted R-squaredCorrect
- BModel B has the higher adjusted R-squared
- CBoth have identical adjusted R-squared
- DAdjusted R-squared of Model B is below zero
Explanation
Model A: 1 - 0.40 x 53/50 = 1 - 0.424 = 0.576. Model B: 1 - 0.39 x 53/48 = 1 - 0.43063 = 0.5694. Model A is higher, so the extra variables are not justified. Relying on raw R-squared would wrongly favor B.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regression Diagnostics shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regression Diagnostics questions
- In the true model Y = 2 + 1.5·X1 − 0.90·X2 + e, the regressors X1 and X2 have correlation 0.50, Var(X1) = 4 and Var(X2) = 9. An analyst omit…
- In a simple regression with n = 25 observations, one observation has a standardized (studentized) residual of 3.4, but its leverage is very …
- Which approach is a standard remedy when a regression's residuals exhibit serial correlation and the analyst wants valid inference without c…
- Which of the following is an example of perfect multicollinearity that would prevent OLS from producing a unique solution?
- A regression of y on x gives a slope estimate of 0.80 with a conventional standard error of 0.20. After applying White's heteroskedasticity-…
- The true model is Y = 1.0 + 2.0*X1 + 3.0*X2 + e. An analyst omits X2 and regresses Y on X1 only. In the sample, Cov(X1, X2) = 0.8 and Var(X1…