FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Expectations, Risk Premium, Convexity and the Shape of the Term Structure
Under a model with constant volatility sigma = 1% and zero risk premium, the convexity effect on a T-year zero yield is approximately sigma^2 T^2 / 6 subtracted from the expected-rate average. If the expected short rate is flat at 5%, what is the approximate 10-year yield?
Convexity lowers the yield by sigma squared times T squared over six: 0.0001 times 100 divided by 6 is about 0.167%. Subtracting from the flat 5% expected rate gives a 10-year yield of roughly 4.83%.
- A4.83%Correct
- B4.50%
- C4.92%
- D5.00%
Explanation
Convexity effect = 0.0001 x 100 / 6 = 0.01/6 = 0.001667 = 0.1667%. Yield = 5.00% - 0.167% = 4.833%, about 4.83%. 4.50% uses sigma^2T^2/2 with a wrong scale, 4.92% is a misscaled effect, and 5.00% ignores convexity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Expectations, Risk Premium, Convexity and the Shape of the Term Structure shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Expectations, Risk Premium, Convexity and the Shape of the Term Structure questions
- A portfolio manager notes that the term structure is steeply upward sloping while survey-based expectations imply short rates will stay roug…
- A risk analyst observes a one-year spot rate of 3.00% and a two-year spot rate of 4.00%, both annually compounded. Under the pure expectatio…
- In a one-factor, binomial term structure model, a risk-averse market prices a 2-year zero-coupon bond. The expected price of the bond one ye…
- Under the pure expectations hypothesis, which statement about the shape of the term structure is correct?
- A risk analyst explains why the yield on a long-dated zero-coupon bond is lower than the average of expected future short rates when interes…
- A portfolio manager notes that the observed yield curve is humped: yields rise to a peak at about 5 years and then decline. Assuming expecte…