CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Equity Jurisdictions, Classes, and the Voting Process
Under a sponsored depository receipt program, compared with an unsponsored program, the issuer of the underlying shares is most likely to:
In a sponsored program the issuer enters an agreement with the depositary bank, and receipt holders generally gain more rights, such as voting, along with issuer disclosure. Unsponsored receipts are created without issuer participation, so the issuer has no obligations and holders receive fewer rights.
- Ahave no involvement and bear no obligations to receipt holders
- Bhave shareholder voting rights passed to the depositary bank only
- Center an agreement with the depositary and provide receipt holders with greater rights and informationCorrect
Explanation
In sponsored programs the issuer agrees with the depositary, and receipt holders typically get shareholder rights such as voting and the issuer provides disclosures. Unsponsored programs are set up by the depositary without issuer involvement and give holders fewer rights.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Equity Jurisdictions, Classes, and the Voting Process shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Equity Jurisdictions, Classes, and the Voting Process questions
- In a company using statutory voting, a shareholder owns 200 shares and five directors are to be elected. Under statutory voting, the shareho…
- Compared with a sponsored Level III American depositary receipt (ADR) program, an unsponsored ADR program is most likely to:
- A company has 5 board seats up for election. An investor owns 1,000 shares under a cumulative voting system. Compared with statutory voting,…
- A shareholder cannot attend the company's general meeting and signs a document authorizing another person to cast her votes in line with her…
- A firm's Class A shares (one vote each) trade at a lower price than its otherwise identical Class B shares (ten votes each). The price diffe…
- Shareholders of a company are asked to vote on a non-binding resolution approving executive pay. This type of vote is best described as: