FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Fundamental Review of the Trading Book
Under FRTB, a bank computes unconstrained ES for the whole portfolio as 80 and ES for each of the risk classes with the constraint of being computed on the stress period as follows: the sum of the standalone class ES figures is 100. Which statement best describes how the aggregate is used in the internal models capital calculation?
FRTB recognises only partial diversification. The aggregate ES blends the full-portfolio ES with the sum of the standalone risk-class ES figures through a regulatory weighting, so the charge lies between the diversified figure of 80 and the undiversified sum of 100, rather than at either extreme.
- AThe standalone sums are used in full with no diversification benefit recognised between risk classes
- BThe model recognises partial diversification by combining the full-portfolio ES with the sum of the standalone ES figures through a weightingCorrect
- CThe full-portfolio ES of 80 alone is the capital charge because diversification is fully allowed
- DThe lowest of the class ES figures is selected as the capital charge
Explanation
FRTB's aggregate capital measure is a weighted combination: the unconstrained full-portfolio ES plus a supervisory-weighted add-on from the sum of standalone class ES, with a weight of 50% on the constrained component. This recognises only partial diversification. Using 80 alone ignores the limit; using the full sum ignores any diversification.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Fundamental Review of the Trading Book shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Fundamental Review of the Trading Book questions
- A risk manager at a bank is summarizing for the board why the Basel Committee launched the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book after the …
- A risk manager at a bank is explaining to the board why the Basel Committee launched the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) after…
- Which statement best explains why FRTB replaced VaR with expected shortfall as the internal model measure, in light of the shortcomings seen…
- Under FRTB, which instruments are required to be assigned to the trading book regardless of the bank's intent?
- Under Basel 2.5, a bank's internal-models market risk capital charge included a stressed VaR component alongside ordinary VaR. What was the …
- Basel 2.5 introduced the stressed VaR requirement in response to losses in the 2007-2009 crisis. A bank's 10-day 99% VaR from current market…