CS Executive · Tax Laws and Practice · Clubbing Provisions and Set Off and Carry Forward of Losses
Vikram transfers an income-yielding asset to his son's wife, Pooja, without adequate consideration. Which statement correctly describes the tax position of income from that asset?
Income from an asset given by Vikram to his daughter-in-law without adequate consideration is clubbed in Vikram's total income. The clubbing rule covers transfers to the son's wife as well, so the transferor remains taxable on the income.
- AIt is clubbed in Vikram's incomeCorrect
- BIt is taxed in Pooja's hands only, as she is not the spouse
- CIt is exempt for both
- DIt is clubbed in the income of Vikram's son always
Explanation
The clubbing provision on transfers without adequate consideration also covers transfers to the son's wife. The income from the asset is therefore included in the transferor's, Vikram's, total income. Taxing it only in Pooja's hands would defeat the anti-avoidance purpose of the rule.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Clubbing Provisions and Set Off and Carry Forward of Losses shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Clubbing Provisions and Set Off and Carry Forward of Losses questions
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, Anil has a speculation loss of Rs 60,000 from last year's carry forward. This year he has profit of Rs 90,00…
- Aarav Traders has a loss of Rs 5,00,000 from a specified business in a tax year and no profit from any other specified business in that year…
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025 (applicable from the June 2027 session), what is the basic principle behind the clubbing provisions?
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025 (applicable from the June 2027 session), Meera Traders has a loss of Rs 80,000 from a speculation business in…
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, Sunrise Ltd (a company) has two business parts. Its business includes purchase and sale of shares of other c…
- Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, Meera incurred a speculation loss of Rs 1,00,000 in tax year 1, which she could not set off in that year. Fo…