FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Integrated Risk Management
When designing a reverse stress test, which approach is correct?
A reverse stress test begins with a defined unacceptable outcome, such as breaching minimum capital or business model failure, and then works backward to identify the combinations of events that could cause it. This contrasts with conventional tests, which start from a scenario and estimate its effects.
- AStart with a predefined moderate macroeconomic scenario and estimate the resulting capital ratio
- BStart with a specified adverse outcome, such as failure of the business model or breach of minimum capital, and identify the scenarios that could cause itCorrect
- CReplicate the worst historical loss and scale it by 1.5
- DUse only the bank's regulatory VaR model to generate shocks
Explanation
Reverse stress testing starts from an unacceptable outcome, such as insolvency or business model failure, and works backward to find plausible scenarios that produce it. Starting from a scenario and computing results is a conventional forward stress test.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Integrated Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Integrated Risk Management questions
- An asset manager's ERM framework uses the three lines model. The risk function independently challenges a trading desk's valuation methodolo…
- In the three lines model of risk governance at a large bank, which activity is most appropriately performed by the second line?
- A bank computes aggregate capital of 134 from stand-alone amounts of credit 90, market 60 and operational 30 (sum 180). Using the standard v…
- A bank allocates economic capital to business units using incremental (marginal) contributions to total portfolio capital. The risk team not…
- A bank's board is reviewing its risk appetite framework. Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of a risk appetite statem…
- A bank's portfolio has total economic capital of USD 200 million at a 99.9% confidence level. Using the Euler (covariance) allocation, Busin…