CA Intermediate · Financial Management and Strategic Management · Treasury and Cash Management
Which of the following is a feature of the Miller-Orr model of cash management that distinguishes it from the Baumol model?
The Miller-Orr model uses upper and lower control limits and a return point to manage cash when daily flows are random and unpredictable. Baumol, by contrast, assumes steady certain outflows. Transaction costs and opportunity costs both feature in the Miller-Orr formula.
- AIt assumes cash outflows are steady and certain
- BIt sets upper and lower control limits with a return point, allowing for random daily cash flowsCorrect
- CIt ignores transaction costs of converting securities
- DIt requires cash balance to be zero at each period end
Explanation
Miller-Orr deals with uncertain, random cash flows by fixing a lower limit, a return point and an upper limit. Baumol assumes steady, predictable usage, so the first option describes Baumol, not Miller-Orr. Transaction costs are included in Miller-Orr.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Treasury and Cash Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Treasury and Cash Management questions
- Aarav Traders receives cheques totalling Rs 20 lakh a month and a lockbox arrangement with its bank reduces the collection float by 3 days. …
- In treasury management, the term 'netting' in the context of a multinational group's cash management refers to:
- Under the Miller-Orr model, which statement is correct?
- Which instrument is a short-term unsecured promissory note issued by creditworthy corporates at a discount to face value, commonly used to p…
- Which of the following is a typical function of the treasury department of a company, as distinct from the controller's function?
- Under the Baumol model, a firm needs Rs 6,00,000 cash a year, the cost per transaction of converting securities is Rs 300 and the annual hol…