FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · The Governance of Risk Management
Which situation best illustrates a weak risk culture, as opposed to a weakness in risk appetite metrics?
Paying bonuses on short-term revenue while discouraging staff from raising limit concerns shows weak risk culture, because culture is about behaviors, incentives and openness to challenge. Choices of metrics, confidence levels or review frequency are design issues, not cultural ones.
- AThe RAS uses VaR but not stress-test limits
- BTraders are paid bonuses on short-term revenue, and staff who raise limit concerns are told they are slowing business downCorrect
- CThe board reviews the RAS annually rather than quarterly
- DThe firm's economic capital model uses a 99.9% rather than 99% confidence level
Explanation
Risk culture concerns norms, attitudes and behaviors toward risk, shaped by incentives, tone from the top and willingness to challenge. Rewarding short-term revenue and discouraging escalation signals a weak culture. The other options are about metric choice or review frequency, which are design matters.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Governance of Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Governance of Risk Management questions
- In the three lines of defense model commonly used in risk governance, which activity is the responsibility of the second line?
- A trading desk's risk appetite sets a 99% one-day VaR limit of USD 10 million for the desk. The firm's overall board-approved risk capacity …
- Under good risk governance practice for a financial institution, which arrangement best preserves the independence of the Chief Risk Officer…
- Which role is most appropriate for a Chief Risk Officer (CRO) in a well-governed financial institution?
- In its review of the 2007-2009 financial crisis, which governance weakness at many large banks is most consistent with GARP's reading on the…
- Which activity is MOST appropriately a core responsibility of the CRO rather than of the business lines?