CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Financial and Cost Accounting · Bills of Exchange
Which statement about an accommodation bill is correct?
An accommodation bill is drawn and accepted without any genuine trade transaction between the parties, purely to help one or both raise funds, usually by discounting it with a bank. The acceptor is still liable to a holder for value.
- AIt is drawn to settle a genuine sale of goods between the drawer and the acceptor
- BIt is drawn and accepted without consideration, to help one or both parties raise fundsCorrect
- CIt cannot be discounted with a bank
- DIt creates no liability on the acceptor towards a holder in due course
Explanation
An accommodation bill is drawn and accepted without a trade transaction, so that one or both parties can raise funds by discounting it. It can be discounted, and the acceptor is liable to a bank or holder for value. Hence only the statement about lack of consideration between the parties is correct.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Bills of Exchange shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Bills of Exchange questions
- Anil Enterprises owes Rs 30,000 to Deepak & Sons. It endorses to Deepak a Rs 24,000 bill received from Karan, in part settlement of the debt…
- Ravi Traders draws a bill of Rs 40,000 on Suresh Pvt Ltd, which Suresh accepts purely to help Ravi raise funds, with no goods sold between t…
- Neeraj Ltd. held a bill of Rs 60,000 accepted by Omkar, discounted with the bank for Rs 58,800. The bill was dishonoured at maturity and the…
- Anil draws a ₹30,000 bill on Bimal, who accepts it. Anil immediately endorses it to his creditor Chand in full settlement of ₹30,000 owed. T…
- In a bill of exchange drawn by Mehta Traders on Rao & Co. payable to Sharma Bros., who is the 'drawee'?
- Ravi draws a bill for ₹50,000 on Sunil, who accepts it. Ravi discounts it with his bank for ₹48,500, and Sunil is declared insolvent before …