Skip to content

CS Professional · Internal and Forensic Audit · Fraud Detecting Techniques

While reviewing the accounts payable ledger of Gokul Retail Ltd, a forensic auditor finds a vendor whose address matches that of an employee in the purchase department. Which fraud scheme is most likely suspected?

A shell or fictitious vendor billing scheme with an undisclosed conflict of interest is suspected. When a supplier's address matches a purchase employee's address, the employee may be billing the company through a controlled entity. Matching vendor and employee master data is the standard detection technique.

  1. AShell or fictitious vendor billing scheme involving a conflict of interestCorrect
  2. BCash skimming at the retail counter
  3. CLapping of receivables
  4. DChannel stuffing at year end

Explanation

A vendor sharing an address with a purchasing employee suggests a fictitious or related vendor used for fraudulent billing. Skimming and lapping concern receipts from customers, and channel stuffing concerns revenue inflation, so they do not fit.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Fraud Detecting Techniques shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Fraud Detecting Techniques questions