Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction

A practitioner notes that historical correlations between a stress driver and other risk factors are much higher during crisis periods than in calm periods. What is the most appropriate implication for constructing a market-driven scenario?

The scenario builder should consider estimating correlations from stressed periods. When correlations rise in crises, full-sample estimates understate how far other factors are expected to move given the driver's shock, so the scenario would understate losses. Setting correlations to zero or ignoring other factors discards the co-movement.

  1. AUse the full-sample correlation, since it uses the most data and is therefore always the most reliable
  2. BSet all correlations to zero so that factor shocks are independent
  3. CConsider estimating correlations from stressed periods, because full-sample correlations may understate conditional co-movement in a crisisCorrect
  4. DUse only the driver's shock and leave all other factors unchanged

Explanation

If correlations rise in stress, a full-sample estimate understates the conditional shocks to other factors and therefore the scenario loss. Using stress-period or stress-weighted correlations produces more plausible joint shocks. Zero correlation or ignoring other factors would remove the co-movement the approach is meant to capture.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction questions