FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction
A risk team builds a market-driven scenario by choosing one risk factor to shock severely and then setting the other factors at their expected values conditional on that shock. Which statistical relationship is the main input used to set the conditional moves in the other factors?
The covariance (or correlation plus volatility) matrix of factor returns is used. It lets the analyst project the severe shock in one factor onto the others, giving their expected moves conditional on that shock. Standalone volatilities or exposures ignore how factors co-move.
- AThe historical covariance matrix of factor returns, used to project the shock onto the other factorsCorrect
- BThe implied volatility of each factor taken separately
- CThe fixed notional exposure of the portfolio to each factor
- DThe credit rating of the counterparties in the portfolio
Explanation
Conditional expected shocks come from the joint distribution of factors, typically assumed multivariate normal. The covariance matrix tells how much each other factor is expected to move given the stressed factor. Standalone volatilities ignore co-movement, and exposures or ratings are not part of the conditioning.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction questions
- Assume factors X and Y are jointly normal with zero means. Factor X has daily volatility of 2.0%, factor Y has daily volatility of 3.0%, and…
- A risk manager at an asset manager wants stress scenarios that avoid the criticism that purely historical or purely hypothetical scenarios a…
- In constructing a plausible market-driven scenario, why does a risk manager set the non-shocked factors to their conditional expected values…
- A risk manager at an asset manager argues that purely historical stress scenarios, such as replaying 2008, are insufficient for stress testi…
- A chief risk officer wants stress testing to complement VaR. Which statement best explains the role of scenario analysis relative to VaR?
- A risk committee reviews a market-driven scenario result showing a 4% portfolio loss. Which statement reflects the correct way to use this r…