Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction

A risk committee reviews a market-driven scenario result showing a 4% portfolio loss. Which statement reflects the correct way to use this result?

The 4% loss should be used as a plausible, internally consistent what-if outcome conditional on the chosen shocks. It informs exposure decisions but is not a forecast, a maximum loss, or a confidence-level measure like VaR.

  1. ATreat it as a forecast of the most likely next-quarter outcome
  2. BTreat it as the maximum possible loss for the portfolio
  3. CUse it as a plausible, internally consistent what-if outcome to inform exposures and actions, recognising it is conditional on the chosen shocksCorrect
  4. DTreat it as a statistical confidence-level loss comparable to a 99% VaR

Explanation

Scenario results are conditional what-if assessments tied to the chosen shocks and relationships. They are not forecasts, worst-case bounds, or confidence-level measures. Their value lies in informing decisions on exposures.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Market-Driven Scenarios: An Approach for Plausible Scenario Construction questions