FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Measures of Financial Risk
A risk manager estimates 95% VaR by historical simulation from n independent observations. Which change would be expected to reduce the standard error of the VaR quantile estimate, holding the underlying distribution fixed?
Increasing the sample size reduces the standard error of the VaR quantile estimate. The error is proportional to the square root of p(1-p)/n divided by the density at the quantile, so more data shrinks it, while going further into the tail or using fewer observations enlarges it.
- AIncreasing the sample size nCorrect
- BMoving the confidence level from 95% to 99.9%
- CUsing a bin width of zero when estimating density at the quantile
- DReducing the sample size to focus on recent data only
Explanation
The standard error of a quantile estimate is sqrt(p(1-p)/n)/f(q), so it falls as n rises. Moving deeper into the tail lowers the density f(q) and raises the error. Fewer observations also raises the error.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measures of Financial Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measures of Financial Risk questions
- A distortion risk measure uses the distortion function g(s) = s^0.5 applied to the survival function of a loss that takes value 0 with proba…
- Why is VaR generally not regarded as a coherent spectral risk measure?
- A portfolio has a current risk measure of USD 20 million. The firm adds USD 5 million of risk-free cash to the portfolio. If the risk measur…
- A risk manager estimates the one-day 95% VaR of a portfolio at USD 2.0 million. Which statement about the one-day 95% expected shortfall (ES…
- A portfolio's daily profit and loss is normally distributed with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of USD 2.0 million. Using a z-value…
- Losses on a portfolio are modeled as discrete: 0 with probability 0.90, 100 with probability 0.06 and 200 with probability 0.04. Using the 9…