FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Hypothesis Testing
An analyst tests whether a mean return differs from zero. The 95% confidence interval for the mean is 0.30% to 2.10%. Which conclusion is correct for a two-sided test at the 5% significance level of H0: mean = 0?
Reject the null hypothesis. A 95% confidence interval corresponds to a two-sided 5% test, and any hypothesized value outside the interval is rejected. Zero lies below the lower bound of 0.30%, so the mean is statistically different from zero.
- AReject H0, because zero lies outside the intervalCorrect
- BFail to reject H0, because the interval is narrow
- CFail to reject H0, because the sample mean is positive
- DReject H0 only if the interval is also centered on zero
Explanation
A two-sided test at 5% rejects any hypothesized value lying outside the 95% confidence interval. Zero is below 0.30%, so it falls outside and H0 is rejected. Interval width and the sign of the mean do not determine the decision.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Hypothesis Testing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Hypothesis Testing questions
- A sample of 100 daily P&L observations has a mean of 1.50 (in USD thousands) and a sample standard deviation of 10.0. Using a large-sample n…
- A 95% confidence interval for a portfolio's mean annual excess return is computed as 2.0% to 8.0% from a large sample. A risk manager uses t…
- A multiple regression with 3 explanatory variables and 44 observations gives a coefficient estimate of 1.20 with standard error 0.50. Test H…
- A risk analyst tests whether the mean daily P&L of a trading desk differs from zero. She sets H0: mu = 0 against H1: mu ≠ 0 at a 5% signific…
- A bank's model validation team tests H0: the model is adequate, against H1: the model is inadequate. They fail to reject H0, but the model i…
- A researcher runs 20 independent tests of different trading signals, each at the 5% significance level, and all signals truly have no predic…