CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Registration
Shree Ganesh Traders, Pune, a regular taxpayer, was granted registration under the Maharashtra SGST Act. Its application for registration was not rejected within the time specified under the CGST Act for rejection. Which statement about its registration under the CGST Act is correct?
Registration granted under the State GST Act is deemed to be a grant under the CGST Act, provided the application was not rejected within the time specified in section 25(10). No separate application, verification or waiting period is required for this deemed registration.
- AIt is deemed to be granted registration under the CGST Act, since the SGST grant is deemed a grant under the CGST Act subject to the application not being rejected within the specified timeCorrect
- BIt must file a separate application, as SGST registration has no effect under the CGST Act
- CIt is deemed registered only if the Central officer physically verifies the premises
- DIt is deemed registered only after a period of six months from the SGST grant
Explanation
Section 26(1) provides that grant of registration under the SGST/UTGST Act is deemed a grant under the CGST Act, subject to the condition that the application has not been rejected within the time specified in section 25(10). The other options add conditions (separate application, verification, six months) that the section does not contain.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Registration shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Registration questions
- Kaveri Enterprises, a regular taxpayer, was served a show-cause notice proposing cancellation of its registration for non-filing of returns.…
- Rohan Pvt Ltd, a registered person, has its registration cancelled with effect from 1 March. On 28 February it held inputs in stock with ITC…
- The registration of Dinesh Hardware was cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion for non-filing of returns. Dinesh wishes to seek r…
- Meera Textiles, Jaipur, applied for revocation of cancellation. The proper officer is inclined to reject the application, as the explanation…
- Kiran Pvt Ltd's registration was cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion. The company applies for revocation and the officer is in…
- Ravi Traders, a registered regular taxpayer in Jaipur, discontinued its business on 31 March. It applied for cancellation of registration. O…