CS Professional · CSR and Social Governance · Guidelines on CSR
Tarang Steel Ltd spent more than its required CSR amount in FY 2026-27. Which statement is correct under section 135(5)?
The company may set off the excess amount against its CSR spending requirement for succeeding financial years, in the manner and for the number of years prescribed, as permitted by the third proviso to section 135(5).
- AThe excess is lost and cannot be used again
- BThe excess must be refunded to shareholders
- CThe company may set off the excess against the requirement for succeeding financial years, in the prescribed mannerCorrect
- DThe excess may be set off only against the penalty for default
Explanation
The third proviso to section 135(5) allows a company that spends in excess of the requirement to set off the excess against its spending requirement for such number of succeeding financial years and in such manner as may be prescribed. It is not a penalty offset or refund.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Guidelines on CSR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Guidelines on CSR questions
- A research team prepares a timeline of Indian CSR guidelines and regulation. Which chronological order, earliest to latest, is correct?
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has an unspent CSR amount of Rs 40 lakh relating to an ongoing project for FY 2026-27. By when must it be moved to th…
- Narmada Foods Ltd's CSR obligation for the year works out to Rs 45 lakh. Which statement about its CSR governance is correct under section 1…
- Meera, a trainee, writes in her note that the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' CSR Voluntary Guidelines of 2009 required every company to spen…
- Meghna Textiles Ltd, a company with a CSR obligation, has not spent its full 2% amount for the year. None of the unspent amount relates to a…
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd, a private company, has for the immediately preceding financial year a net worth of Rs 300 crore, turnover of Rs 600 crore…