CS Professional · CSR and Social Governance · Guidelines on CSR
A research team prepares a timeline of Indian CSR guidelines and regulation. Which chronological order, earliest to latest, is correct?
The correct order is the MCA Voluntary Guidelines in 2009, the National Voluntary Guidelines in 2011, SEBI's business responsibility reporting requirement in 2012, and the Companies Act, 2013 CSR provisions effective April 2014. This shows the move from voluntary guidance to disclosure and then statutory obligation.
- ANational Voluntary Guidelines (2011); MCA Voluntary Guidelines (2009); SEBI Business Responsibility Report requirement (2012); CSR provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 coming into force (April 2014)
- BMCA Voluntary Guidelines (2009); SEBI Business Responsibility Report requirement (2012); National Voluntary Guidelines (2011); CSR provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 coming into force (April 2014)
- CMCA Voluntary Guidelines (2009); National Voluntary Guidelines (2011); SEBI Business Responsibility Report requirement (2012); CSR provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 coming into force (April 2014)Correct
- DMCA Voluntary Guidelines (2009); National Voluntary Guidelines (2011); CSR provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 coming into force (April 2014); SEBI Business Responsibility Report requirement (2012)
Explanation
The MCA issued voluntary guidelines in 2009 and the National Voluntary Guidelines in 2011. SEBI then required business responsibility reporting in 2012, and the Companies Act, 2013 CSR provisions took effect from 1 April 2014. The other options swap 2009 and 2011, or place SEBI's 2012 requirement wrongly.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Guidelines on CSR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Guidelines on CSR questions
- A CS trainee is tracing how CSR guidance developed in India. She notes a framework issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in 2011 that …
- Nalanda Foods Ltd failed to transfer Rs 30 lakh to a Schedule VII Fund as required. Under section 135(7), what is the maximum penalty on the…
- Vasudha Pvt Ltd is a private company not required to appoint an independent director under section 149(4). It is covered by section 135(1) a…
- Ganga Foods Ltd operates a plant in a district of Madhya Pradesh. While planning its CSR spending, the Board asks what the Act says about wh…
- Tarang Steel Ltd spent more than its required CSR amount in FY 2026-27. Which statement is correct under section 135(5)?
- Tara Motors Ltd had 1,200 security holders (shareholders, debenture-holders and deposit-holders together) at one time during the year. Its S…