CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Returns
The proper officer scrutinised the GSTR-3B of Kaveri Traders, Chennai, and found a mismatch in the tax paid. A notice in FORM GST ASMT-10 was served on 5 March. Under the Rules, within what time must the registered person ordinarily furnish his explanation, unless the officer permits more time?
The explanation must be furnished within a period not exceeding thirty days from the date of service of the ASMT-10 notice, or such further period as the officer permits. Seven working days applies to revocation show-cause replies, and ninety days to revocation applications.
- ANot exceeding fifteen days from the date of service of the notice
- BNot exceeding thirty days from the date of service of the noticeCorrect
- CSeven working days from the date of service of the notice
- DNot exceeding ninety days from the date of service of the notice
Explanation
Rule 99(1) requires the officer to seek an explanation within a time not exceeding thirty days from the date of service of the notice, or such further period as he may permit. Seven working days is the reply period for the REG-23 notice, which is a different procedure. Ninety days is the revocation application period.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Returns questions
- Anand Pharma accepted a discrepancy raised by the proper officer on scrutiny of its return, but did not take corrective measures in its retu…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd's return for March was selected for scrutiny. The proper officer noticed a mismatch between the turnover declared and th…
- Under rule 23, a proper officer is satisfied that sufficient grounds exist for revoking the cancellation of registration of Anand Foods. Wit…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017, Rajan Traders accepted a discrepancy pointed out in FORM GST ASMT-10 and paid the tax and interest. Which course…
- During scrutiny, the proper officer informed Ritu Enterprises of discrepancies in its return. Ritu accepted the discrepancies but did not ma…
- The registration of Rao Enterprises was cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion for failure to furnish returns, and the order was …