CS Executive · Corporate Accounting and Financial Management · Capital Budgeting
Two mutually exclusive projects of Kaveri Industries each have expected NPV, and standard deviation of NPV as follows: Project X: expected NPV ₹2,00,000, standard deviation ₹50,000; Project Y: expected NPV ₹3,00,000, standard deviation ₹100,000... Using the coefficient of variation to compare risk per rupee of return, which statement is correct?
Coefficient of variation equals standard deviation divided by expected NPV. Project X gives 50,000/2,00,000 = 0.25 and Project Y gives 1,00,000/3,00,000 = 0.33. Since X has the lower CV, it carries less risk per rupee of expected return and is preferred on this measure.
- AProject X is less risky relative to return, as its CV is 0.25 against 0.33 for YCorrect
- BProject Y is less risky relative to return, as its CV is 0.25 against 0.33 for X
- CBoth have equal CV of 0.25
- DProject X has CV of 4 and Y has CV of 3, so Y is less risky
Explanation
CV = standard deviation / expected NPV. X: 50,000/2,00,000 = 0.25. Y: 1,00,000/3,00,000 = 0.33. Lower CV means lower risk per unit of return, so X is preferred on this basis. Option D inverts the ratio.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital Budgeting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital Budgeting questions
- Rohan Pharma is considering a project costing Rs 1,00,000 that produces Rs 60,000 at the end of each of the next 2 years. Using the discount…
- Which feature most clearly makes capital budgeting decisions different from routine working capital decisions?
- Which feature makes capital budgeting decisions different from routine working capital decisions?
- Under capital rationing, why is ranking projects only by NPV potentially misleading when projects are indivisible?
- A project costs Rs 10,00,000 and yields cash inflows of Rs 3,00,000, Rs 4,00,000, Rs 4,00,000 and Rs 5,00,000 in years 1 to 4. Assuming infl…
- Under the capital budgeting process, which statement about a post-completion audit (performance review) is correct?