CS Executive · Corporate Accounting and Financial Management · Capital Budgeting
Two mutually exclusive projects have conventional cash flows. Project P has the higher IRR, while Project Q has the higher NPV at the firm's cost of capital. Which decision is consistent with the wealth-maximisation objective?
Project Q should be accepted. When NPV and IRR rankings conflict for mutually exclusive projects, NPV is preferred because it measures the absolute addition to shareholders' wealth, whereas IRR is a percentage rate that ignores the size of the investment.
- AAccept Project P because a higher percentage return is always better
- BAccept Project Q because it adds more absolute value to shareholders' wealthCorrect
- CAccept both projects since each has a positive NPV
- DReject both projects because their rankings conflict
Explanation
For mutually exclusive projects, the NPV criterion measures the absolute increase in shareholders' wealth, so the project with the higher NPV is chosen when rankings conflict. IRR ignores the scale of the investment. Accepting P because of its higher IRR could leave value unrealised.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital Budgeting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital Budgeting questions
- Two mutually exclusive projects of Kaveri Industries each have expected NPV, and standard deviation of NPV as follows: Project X: expected N…
- Which of the following best describes capital budgeting?
- Which of the following is the most common reason why NPV and IRR can rank mutually exclusive projects differently?
- Gupta Engineering invests Rs 12,00,000 in a machine with 4-year life and Rs 2,00,000 salvage value (straight-line depreciation on the deprec…
- Bharat Auto Ltd. is evaluating a new plant. Data: purchase cost of machinery Rs 40 lakh; installation Rs 5 lakh; working capital to be injec…
- Sharma Textiles Ltd is evaluating a machine costing ₹10,00,000. The company already spent ₹50,000 on a feasibility study last year (non-refu…