FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Measures of Financial Risk
Two portfolios have the same expected return and the same standard deviation. Portfolio A has a symmetric return distribution, while Portfolio B has a large negative skew and excess kurtosis. Which statement about standard deviation as a risk measure is most accurate?
Standard deviation cannot distinguish the two portfolios, so it understates B's tail risk. It depends only on the second moment and treats gains and losses symmetrically, ignoring the negative skew and excess kurtosis that make B's extreme losses more likely.
- AStandard deviation fails to distinguish the tail risk of the two portfolios, so B's extreme loss risk is understated relative to ACorrect
- BStandard deviation shows B is riskier because of its skew
- CStandard deviation is a coherent risk measure, so it captures the difference in tail losses
- DStandard deviation implies A is riskier since it is symmetric
Explanation
Standard deviation uses only the second moment and treats upside and downside deviations equally, ignoring skewness and kurtosis. Thus the two portfolios appear equally risky though B has fatter left-tail risk. It is also not a coherent measure in general.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measures of Financial Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measures of Financial Risk questions
- A portfolio's annual returns are normally distributed with a mean of 8% and a standard deviation of 12%. Using the normal approximation, wha…
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of default within a year, with a loss of 100 on default and no loss otherwise. Using the 95% con…
- A distortion risk measure uses the distortion function g(s) = s^0.5 applied to the survival function of a loss that takes value 0 with proba…
- A portfolio's loss distribution is approximated by these equally likely tail outcomes beyond the 95% VaR cutoff: losses of USD 6 million, 8 …
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of defaulting over one year, with a loss of USD 10 million on default and no loss otherwise. Usi…
- A risk manager estimates 95% VaR by historical simulation from n independent observations. Which change would be expected to reduce the stan…