CS Executive · Corporate Accounting and Financial Management · Consolidation of Accounts
Under AS 21, when the cost to the parent of its investment in a subsidiary is less than the parent's portion of equity of the subsidiary at the date of investment, how is the difference treated in the consolidated financial statements?
The difference is treated as a capital reserve in the consolidated financial statements. Under AS 21, when the parent's cost of investment is lower than its portion of the subsidiary's equity at the date of investment, the shortfall is a capital reserve, not goodwill or a profit and loss item.
- ATreated as goodwill and shown as an asset
- BTreated as a capital reserveCorrect
- CCharged to the consolidated statement of profit and loss
- DAdjusted against minority interest
Explanation
AS 21 provides that where cost of investment is less than the parent's portion of equity at the date of investment, the difference is treated as capital reserve. Goodwill arises only in the opposite case, where cost exceeds the parent's portion of equity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Consolidation of Accounts shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Consolidation of Accounts questions
- Under Ind AS 110, how must an investment entity ordinarily account for an investment in a subsidiary that is not itself an investment entity…
- A parent acquired a subsidiary on 1 April 2025. Under Ind AS 110, the subsidiary's plant was recognised in the consolidated statements at a …
- Alpha Ltd holds 80% of Beta Ltd, and Beta Ltd holds 70% of Gamma Ltd. Gamma Ltd is controlled by Beta Ltd, and Beta Ltd is controlled by Alp…
- Meru Ltd acquired 60% of Kailash Ltd for Rs 7,50,000. At the date of investment Kailash Ltd had share capital Rs 6,00,000, general reserve R…
- Under Ind AS 110, where must non-controlling interests be presented in the consolidated balance sheet?
- Under Ind AS 110, where is the gain or loss on loss of control of a subsidiary recognised, in terms of whom it is attributable to?