CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Anti-profiteering
Under the anti-profiteering provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person who is found by the Authority to have profiteered is liable to a penalty equal to what proportion of the profiteered amount?
The penalty is ten per cent of the amount profiteered. Section 171(3A) ties the penalty to the profiteered sum determined by the Authority, not to the supplier's turnover or to a full repayment of that sum.
- ATen per cent of the amount so profiteeredCorrect
- BTwenty-five per cent of the amount so profiteered
- COne hundred per cent of the amount so profiteered
- DTen per cent of the turnover of the supplier
Explanation
Section 171(3A) provides that a registered person found to have profiteered is liable to a penalty equivalent to ten per cent of the amount profiteered. It is based on the profiteered amount, not on turnover. Hence the turnover-based option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Anti-profiteering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Anti-profiteering questions
- During an anti-profiteering investigation, a party submits information on a confidential basis and claims it cannot be summarised. Under the…
- The Authority passes an order on 5 March holding that Sudarshan Foods Pvt Ltd profiteered Rs 4,00,000 by not passing on ITC benefit. The com…
- The Authority concludes that Surya Appliances Ltd. profiteered Rs 8,00,000 by not passing on a rate reduction. The order is passed on 10 Mar…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017 on anti-profiteering proceedings, within what period must the Director General of Anti-profiteering complete the …
- Under the anti-profiteering provision of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person is held by the Authority to have profiteered Rs 2,00,000. T…
- Following a rate cut, an Authority finds that Sai Foods Ltd. profiteered Rs 8,00,000 and passes an order on 1 March. Consider the following:…