CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Anti-profiteering
Under the CGST Rules, 2017 on anti-profiteering proceedings, within what period must the Director General of Anti-profiteering complete the investigation after receiving the reference from the Standing Committee, and what extension is possible?
The Director General must complete the investigation within six months of receiving the Standing Committee's reference. The period can be extended by a further period not exceeding three months, for reasons recorded in writing, as allowed by the Authority, under rule 129(6).
- AThree months, extendable by a further three months
- BSix months, extendable by a further period not exceeding three months for reasons recorded in writing as allowed by the AuthorityCorrect
- CSix months, extendable by up to six months by the Standing Committee
- DTwelve months, with no extension
Explanation
Rule 129(6) as amended requires completion within six months of receipt of the reference. An extension of not more than a further three months is allowed for reasons recorded in writing, as allowed by the Authority. Three months was the earlier period before the 2019 substitution.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Anti-profiteering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Anti-profiteering questions
- Under the anti-profiteering provision, which of the following is correctly stated about the Authority and the term 'profiteered'?
- Under the anti-profiteering provision of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following must be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurat…
- Under the anti-profiteering provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person is held by the Authority to have profiteered Rs 4,00,000. …
- Under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017, which statement about the notice issued by the Director General of Anti-profiteering before initiati…
- The Authority passes an order on 10 March holding that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000. The company deposits the full profiteered…
- The Authority concludes that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000 by not passing on a tax rate reduction. The company does not deposit…