CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
Veda Tools Pvt Ltd sells a patented drill bit in Pune. Its packaging carries only the word "Patented" with no patent number. Karan Engineering, unaware of any patent, copies and sells the bit. In the infringement suit, what is the position on damages against Karan?
Karan can escape damages or an account of profits by proving he was unaware and had no reasonable grounds to believe a patent existed. The word "Patented" without the patent number does not deem him aware. An injunction can still be granted.
- AKaran can avoid damages or an account of profits if he proves he was unaware and had no reasonable grounds to believe a patent existed, as the bare word "Patented" without a number does not make him awareCorrect
- BDamages must be awarded, because the word "Patented" on the article is enough to fix him with knowledge
- CDamages are barred and the court also cannot grant an injunction against Karan
- DDamages are barred only if Karan proves that the patent was invalid
Explanation
Section 111(1) bars damages or an account of profits against a defendant who proves he was not aware and had no reasonable grounds for believing the patent existed. Under the Explanation, the word "patented" does not by itself give awareness unless the patent number accompanies it. Option 3 is wrong because s.111(4) preserves the power to grant an injunction.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Rao Industries is sued for infringing a patent for a machine. It pleads that its making and use of the machine was in accordance with the co…
- Dhanush Chemicals holds a patent whose specification was amended by way of disclaimer after publication. It sues Eshan Ltd for use of the in…
- Nisha Enterprises, an exclusive licensee, sues Omkar Ltd for infringement committed after the date of its licence and does not join the pate…
- Rohit Engineering filed a parent application, and the Controller objected that its claims relate to more than one invention. Rohit files a f…
- Meera Textiles Pvt Ltd files a patent application in Chennai for a new dyeing process. Two years later she realises nobody has asked for exa…
- Veda Pharma sues Kiran Labs for infringing its process patent. Kiran Labs, in its written statement, argues that the patent is liable to be …