CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
Vikram Engineering made a request for examination of its application under Section 11B. Which statement about what follows and about the rule-making power is correct?
After a valid request, the Controller refers the application at the earliest to an examiner under Section 12 for a report. The manner and period for making the request are matters left to rules under Section 159(2)(id), not fixed in Section 11B itself.
- AThe Controller must grant the patent within the prescribed period
- BThe application is referred at the earliest by the Controller to an examiner under Section 12, and the manner and period of the request are fixed by rules under Section 159Correct
- CThe examiner decides on grant, and rules play no part in the request
- DThe application is published only after the examiner reports
Explanation
Section 12(1) says that when a request is made under Section 11B(1) or (3), the Controller refers the application at the earliest to an examiner for a report. Section 159(2)(id) empowers rules on the manner of requesting examination and the period. The Controller does not have to grant within a period, and the examiner only reports.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Zenith Agro Pvt Ltd's patent application for a drought-resistant seed treatment was published on 1 March, and no patent has yet been granted…
- Meghna Pharma Ltd filed a patent application in India on 10 March. The application was published on 15 October of the following year. A riva…
- Kavita Engineering's complete specification, before grant, claims a pump with a ceramic impeller. It seeks to amend it to also claim a pump …
- Anil Engineering filed Application A in India on 1 April. Another applicant, Bharat Motors, filed Application B on 1 July claiming the same …
- After examining the Opposition Board's recommendation and hearing both the patentee and the opponent, the Controller finds that a patent can…
- Anita Textiles sues Bharat Looms for infringing a patented loom mechanism. Bharat Looms proves that when it sold the looms it neither knew n…