CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Compliance Rating, Anti-Profiteering, GST Practitioners and Authorised Representative
Which of the following correctly describes a power the Central Government has under Section 171(2) regarding the anti-profiteering Authority?
The Central Government may, on the Council's recommendations, notify the date after which the Authority will stop accepting requests for examination of profiteering. It has no power under this section to fix selling prices, raise the penalty above ten per cent, or exempt persons from passing on benefits.
- AIt may, on the Council's recommendations, notify the date from which the Authority will not accept any request for examinationCorrect
- BIt may fix the price at which each registered person must sell goods
- CIt may require the Authority to levy penalty of twenty per cent of the profiteered amount
- DIt may exempt any registered person from passing on input tax credit benefit by order
Explanation
The proviso to Section 171(2) lets the Government, on the Council's recommendations, specify by notification the date from which the Authority shall not accept any request for examination. The Act contains no power to fix prices or exempt persons, and the penalty is ten per cent, not twenty.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Compliance Rating, Anti-Profiteering, GST Practitioners and Authorised Representative shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Compliance Rating, Anti-Profiteering, GST Practitioners and Authorised Representative questions
- Section 149(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that a compliance rating score may be assigned to which persons?
- Shri Verma retired as a Group-B Gazetted officer of a State Commercial Tax Department after serving in that post for four years. Retirement …
- Aarav Foods Ltd. was found by the anti-profiteering Authority to have profiteered Rs 5,00,000 by not passing on a rate reduction. The order …
- A supplier is held to have profiteered Rs 7,50,000 and does not deposit the amount within thirty days of the Authority's order. Under Sectio…
- Mr. Rao, an advocate, was disqualified from representing taxpayers under the Maharashtra GST Act for misconduct. He now seeks to appear for …
- Under the anti-profiteering provision of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following must be passed on to the recipient by way of a commensur…