CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Compliance Rating, Anti-Profiteering, GST Practitioners and Authorised Representative
A supplier is held to have profiteered Rs 7,50,000 and does not deposit the amount within thirty days of the Authority's order. Under Section 171(3A), what penalty is leviable?
The penalty is Rs 75,000, being ten per cent of the profiteered amount of Rs 7,50,000. Since the amount was not deposited within thirty days of the order, the proviso to Section 171(3A) does not apply and the penalty is leviable.
- ARs 75,000Correct
- BRs 7,50,000
- CRs 3,75,000
- DRs 1,50,000
Explanation
The penalty equals ten per cent of the profiteered amount: 10% x 7,50,000 = Rs 75,000. The proviso exemption is lost because the deposit was not made within thirty days. Rs 3,75,000 wrongly uses 50%.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Compliance Rating, Anti-Profiteering, GST Practitioners and Authorised Representative shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Compliance Rating, Anti-Profiteering, GST Practitioners and Authorised Representative questions
- The Authority examining anti-profiteering concludes that Kaveri Foods Ltd has profiteered Rs 8,00,000. Kaveri Foods deposits the profiteered…
- The Authority examining profiteering under Section 171 finds that a registered person profiteered ₹4,00,000. He deposits the profiteered amo…
- Which statement about the meaning of 'profiteered' and the 'Authority' in Section 171 is correct?
- Under Section 116 of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following persons can be an authorised representative of a registered person without a…
- Under the CGST Act, 2017, a registered person is summoned to appear before a GST officer for examination on oath. Which statement is correct…
- A retired Group-B Gazetted officer of a State Commercial Tax Department, who held that post for three years during service, retired on 1 Jul…