CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37)
Which one of the following statements about the term 'contingent' in Ind AS 37 is correct?
In Ind AS 37, 'contingent' applies to liabilities and assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. It also applies to liabilities that fail the recognition criteria. Estimated provisions are not contingent liabilities merely because their timing or amount is uncertain.
- AIt is used for liabilities and assets whose existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control, and also for liabilities failing the recognition criteriaCorrect
- BIt is used only for assets and never for liabilities
- CIt describes any provision whose amount is estimated
- DIt is used for obligations that the entity has fully discharged but not yet recorded
Explanation
Paragraph 12 states that in a general sense all provisions are contingent because of uncertainty, but within the Standard 'contingent' is reserved for items whose existence is confirmed only by uncertain events not wholly within the entity's control, and also for liabilities that do not meet the recognition criteria. Estimated provisions are not therefore contingent items, and the other options contradict the text.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37) questions
- Meera Pharma Ltd's liability arises from an item that is specifically dealt with by another Ind AS. Under the scope of Ind AS 37, what is th…
- Under Ind AS 37, a provision is recognised as a liability only when it is a present obligation and it is probable that an outflow of resourc…
- Which combination correctly reflects the scope rules and Indian-specific features of Ind AS 37 compared with IAS 37?
- Rohini Textiles Ltd has a present obligation from a past event relating to a customer's claim. An outflow of resources is probable, but the …
- Himalaya Pharma Ltd is defending a lawsuit. Legal advisers say it is yet to be confirmed whether the company has a present obligation at all…
- Under Ind AS 37, a present obligation for which it is not probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required…