Skip to content

CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37)

Himalaya Pharma Ltd is defending a lawsuit. Legal advisers say it is yet to be confirmed whether the company has a present obligation at all, as the outcome depends on a court finding on disputed facts. How does Ind AS 37 classify this item?

It is a contingent liability. Where it has yet to be confirmed whether the entity has a present obligation that could lead to an outflow, the item is a possible obligation and is not recognised as a liability. Uncertainty about timing or amount alone is what distinguishes provisions, not existence.

  1. AProvision, because all provisions are uncertain in timing or amount
  2. BContingent liability, being a possible obligationCorrect
  3. CContingent asset, because the outcome is uncertain
  4. DProvision, provided the claim exceeds ₹1 crore

Explanation

Paragraph 13(b)(i) classes as contingent liabilities the possible obligations where it has yet to be confirmed whether there is a present obligation that could lead to an outflow. Paragraph 12 notes provisions are uncertain in timing or amount but are still present obligations. No monetary threshold appears in the text.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37) questions