CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · Audit of Various Items of Financial Statements
Which procedure is most effective for detecting cut-off errors in revenue at the year-end?
The most effective procedure is comparing the last dispatch notes before year-end and the first after year-end with the sales entries recorded. This confirms that revenue is booked in the period when control passed, which is the essence of cut-off testing.
- AComparing the last few dispatch notes before and first few after year-end with the sales recorded in the relevant periodCorrect
- BRecomputing depreciation on fixed assets
- CConfirming bank balances with the bank
- DReviewing the minutes of the annual general meeting
Explanation
Cut-off testing matches dispatch or delivery documents near the year-end to the period in which the related sales invoices were recorded. This detects sales booked in the wrong period. The other procedures relate to other assertions.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit of Various Items of Financial Statements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Audit of Various Items of Financial Statements questions
- An auditor sends positive confirmation requests to trade receivables and receives no reply from a customer with a balance of Rs 2,40,000. Wh…
- While auditing the cash balance of a company at the year-end, which procedure is most appropriate for the auditor to obtain direct evidence …
- While auditing purchases of Sundaram Traders Ltd., the auditor wants to confirm that goods purchased during the year were actually received …
- The auditor of Kaveri Industries Ltd. wishes to detect understatement of trade payables at the year end. Which procedure is most effective?
- During the audit of a manufacturing company, the auditor could not attend the physical stock count held on 31 March because of a prior assig…
- Which of the following is a contingent asset that an auditor should expect to be only disclosed, and not recognised, under Ind AS 37?