Skip to content

Corporate Accounting and Auditing · Audit of Various Items of Financial Statements

Audit of Fixed Assets: Verification and Valuation

Updated 10 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Audit of fixed assets means gathering evidence that recorded property, plant, equipment and intangibles exist, belong to the company, are owned and used, are correctly measured, depreciated or amortised, impaired where needed, and properly disclosed. Verification checks existence, ownership and title. Valuation checks the amount at which the asset is carried.

Understand Verification and Valuation of Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are held to be used in the business for more than one period, not to be sold in the ordinary course. They include property, plant and equipment (land, buildings, machinery, vehicles) and intangible assets (software, licences, patents, goodwill acquired). They are usually material, so auditors spend real effort on them.

Verification answers: does the asset exist, does the company own it or control it, is it in use, and is it recorded completely? Valuation answers: is the amount at which it is carried correct, given cost, depreciation, impairment and any revaluation? Verification is about facts. Valuation is about amounts. Both together support the assertions of existence, rights and obligations, completeness, valuation and presentation.

The auditor starts with the fixed asset register and checks that it agrees with the general ledger and the balance sheet. Then the auditor tests additions (invoices, approvals, capitalisation policy), disposals (sale proof, approval, profit or loss), physical existence (inspection, management verification programme), title (deeds, registration certificates, lease agreements) and depreciation (method, rates, useful life, consistency).

Intangibles have no physical form, so the auditor relies on documents: licence agreements, registration certificates, development cost records and evidence that recognition criteria are met. Internally generated goodwill is not recognised. Research cost is expensed, while development cost is capitalised only if the standard's criteria are met.

Under Ind AS 36, an asset must not be carried above its recoverable amount (the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use). The auditor checks whether management has looked for impairment indicators and whether the assumptions used are reasonable. Under Schedule III, the balance sheet and notes must disclose gross block, accumulated depreciation, additions, disposals and revaluation. Under CARO 2020 the auditor also reports on the records, physical verification, title deeds of immovable property and revaluation.

Key rules to remember

Verification vs valuation
Verification = existence + ownership + condition; Valuation = correct carrying amount
Use this one-line contrast whenever the question asks for the difference.
Carrying amount
Carrying amount = Cost − Accumulated depreciation − Accumulated impairment loss
With the revaluation model, start from the revalued amount instead of cost.
Straight-line depreciation
Annual depreciation = (Cost − Residual value) ÷ Useful life
Charge pro rata for part-year use where the policy requires it.
Written down value depreciation
Depreciation = Opening carrying amount × Rate
Rate is applied to the reducing balance each year.
Recoverable amount
Recoverable amount = Higher of (Fair value less costs of disposal) and (Value in use)
Impairment loss arises only if carrying amount exceeds recoverable amount.
Impairment loss
Impairment loss = Carrying amount − Recoverable amount
Recognised in profit or loss, unless the asset is carried at a revalued amount.
Profit or loss on disposal
Gain or loss = Net sale proceeds − Carrying amount at date of disposal
Check that depreciation was charged up to the date of sale.

How to solve Verification and Valuation of Fixed Assets questions

Use this order for any question on auditing fixed assets, whether it asks for procedures, duties or a case-based decision.

  1. 1Identify the asset class: land, building, plant, vehicle, intangible, or assets under construction.
  2. 2Name the assertion at stake: existence, rights and ownership, completeness, valuation or disclosure.
  3. 3List verification procedures: register to ledger, physical inspection, title documents, additions and disposal vouchers.
  4. 4List valuation procedures: cost build-up, capitalisation policy, depreciation method and rates, impairment indicators, revaluation by a registered valuer.
  5. 5Check compliance and disclosure: Schedule III notes, relevant accounting standard, CARO 2020 reporting.
  6. 6If numbers are given, recompute depreciation, carrying amount or gain or loss, and compare with the books.
  7. 7Conclude: say whether the treatment is acceptable, what adjustment is needed, and the effect on the audit report if it is not corrected.

Quickest way: Assertion-to-evidence table in your head

When to use it: Use it for theory questions such as 'discuss the auditor's duties regarding fixed assets' when time is short.

  1. Write four headings: Existence, Title, Valuation, Disclosure.
  2. Under each, put two or three evidence types: inspection, deeds and registration, cost invoices and depreciation recomputation, Schedule III notes and CARO.
  3. Add one line on intangibles: documents and recognition criteria instead of inspection.
  4. Finish with one line on impairment and revaluation.
  5. Write each point as a full sentence beginning with an action verb such as 'inspect', 'vouch' or 'recompute'.

Common mistakes in Verification and Valuation of Fixed Assets

  • Treating verification and valuation as the same thing.

    Both are performed on the same asset and the words sound alike.

    Fix: Say verification is about existence and title, valuation is about the amount. Give one example of each.

  • Relying only on physical inspection to prove ownership.

    Seeing an asset feels like proof that it belongs to the company.

    Fix: Inspection supports existence only. Ownership needs title deeds, registration certificates, invoices or lease documents.

  • Capitalising repairs or expensing genuine additions.

    Students do not apply the test of whether future economic benefit increases or life is extended.

    Fix: Capitalise cost that adds to capacity, life or efficiency. Expense routine repairs and maintenance.

  • Forgetting depreciation on assets bought or sold during the year.

    Students focus on opening balances.

    Fix: Check the date of use and date of disposal and charge depreciation for the period of actual use.

  • Treating all intangibles as capitalisable.

    Students assume any spend that benefits the future is an asset.

    Fix: Remember internally generated goodwill is not recognised, research cost is expensed, and development cost is capitalised only when the criteria are met.

  • Reversing the impairment test, comparing cost with recoverable amount.

    Students forget accumulated depreciation.

    Fix: Always compare carrying amount, not original cost, with recoverable amount.

Worked examples

Example 1

A machine was bought on 1 April 2024 for ₹12,00,000 with an estimated residual value of ₹2,00,000 and a useful life of 10 years. The company uses straight-line depreciation. On 31 March 2026 the recoverable amount is estimated at ₹8,50,000. Compute the carrying amount before impairment and the impairment loss, and state what the auditor should check.

Show the solution
  1. Annual depreciation = (₹12,00,000 − ₹2,00,000) ÷ 10 = ₹1,00,000.
  2. Depreciation for two years (to 31 March 2026) = ₹2,00,000.
  3. Carrying amount = ₹12,00,000 − ₹2,00,000 = ₹10,00,000.
  4. Recoverable amount = ₹8,50,000, which is lower than the carrying amount.
  5. Impairment loss = ₹10,00,000 − ₹8,50,000 = ₹1,50,000.
  6. The auditor should check the invoice and capitalisation, the useful life and residual value, the evidence for recoverable amount (valuer report or cash flow assumptions), that the loss is charged to profit or loss, and that future depreciation is based on the revised carrying amount.

Answer: Carrying amount before impairment is ₹10,00,000 and the impairment loss is ₹1,50,000. The asset is then carried at ₹8,50,000.

Example 2

During audit of Sundaram Textiles Ltd., the auditor finds that a factory building shown at ₹90,00,000 has no title deed in the company's records, and that ₹4,00,000 spent on routine repairs was added to the building cost. Explain the audit action and the effect on reporting.

Show the solution
  1. Title: ask management for the registered sale deed or lease deed. If unavailable, check municipal tax receipts, utility bills, and obtain a legal opinion or confirmation from the company's advocate.
  2. The auditor should also check whether the property is mortgaged by looking at charge records and bank confirmations.
  3. Repairs: routine repairs do not add to capacity or life, so ₹4,00,000 is revenue expenditure and should be charged to profit and loss.
  4. Adjustment: building falls to ₹86,00,000 (before depreciation), and profit falls by ₹4,00,000, less any depreciation already charged on it.
  5. Reporting: ask management to correct it. If the amount is uncorrected and material, modify the opinion. For immovable property whose title deeds are not held in the company's name, CARO 2020 requires the auditor to report details.
  6. Document the evidence, management's reply and the conclusion in the working papers.

Answer: The auditor should obtain title evidence, treat ₹4,00,000 as an expense and reduce the building to ₹86,00,000 before depreciation. Uncorrected material issues lead to a modified opinion, and title deed exceptions go in the CARO 2020 report.

Exam tips

  • For 'verification and valuation' questions, give a short definition of each first, then procedures, as this earns clear step marks.
  • In MCQs, check whether the stem asks about existence (inspection), ownership (title documents) or valuation (cost, depreciation, impairment). Each has a different best evidence.
  • In numerical parts, show formula, working and final carrying amount on separate lines, and recompute depreciation for part years.
  • Link at least one point to Schedule III disclosure or CARO 2020 reporting in theory answers on fixed assets.
  • For intangible assets, always mention recognition criteria and amortisation over useful life, not just 'check documents'.

Practice questions from Audit of Various Items of Financial Statements

Verification and Valuation of Fixed Assets in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Verification and Valuation of Fixed Assets: frequently asked questions

What is the difference between verification and valuation of assets?

Verification confirms that an asset exists, is owned by the entity and is in use. Valuation confirms that the amount at which it is shown is appropriate after depreciation, impairment and any permitted revaluation. In audit, both are needed to conclude the balance is fairly stated.

Is the auditor responsible for valuing fixed assets?

No. Management is responsible for valuation and the financial statements. The auditor obtains evidence that the valuation is reasonable and may use an expert's work, but remains responsible for the audit opinion.

How does an auditor verify intangible assets?

By examining documents such as licence agreements, registration certificates and cost records, checking that recognition criteria are met, and testing amortisation over the useful life. There is nothing to inspect physically, so documents carry the weight.

How is impairment checked in an audit?

The auditor looks for impairment indicators, reviews management's estimate of recoverable amount and its assumptions, and recomputes the loss as carrying amount minus recoverable amount. The auditor also checks the accounting and disclosure of the loss.