CMA Final · Risk Management in Banking and Insurance · Sovereign Risk and Insolvency Risk
Which statement about insolvency risk of a bank is most accurate?
Insolvency risk for a bank is the risk that losses exceed its capital, leaving assets worth less than liabilities. It differs from liquidity risk, which concerns timing of cash, and holding statutory liquidity assets does not remove it.
- AIt is the risk that the bank's losses exceed its capital so that its assets become insufficient to meet its liabilitiesCorrect
- BIt is the risk that the bank cannot borrow in the interbank market for one day because of a technical failure
- CIt arises only from a change in the policy repo rate
- DIt is eliminated entirely once a bank maintains the minimum statutory liquidity ratio
Explanation
Insolvency risk means losses erode capital so assets fall below liabilities. A short-term inability to borrow is a liquidity problem, repo changes mainly drive interest rate risk, and holding SLR addresses liquidity, not solvency.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Sovereign Risk and Insolvency Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Sovereign Risk and Insolvency Risk questions
- Under the Altman Z-score model for a listed manufacturing firm, which zone indicates a high probability of financial distress and possible i…
- A bank lends in US dollars to a private manufacturing company located in a foreign country. The company is fully able to pay, but its govern…
- An Indian bank has a large exposure to a foreign government that has announced it will not honour interest payments on its own external debt…
- In the context of sovereign risk, 'transfer risk' refers to the possibility that:
- A bank's total risk-weighted assets are ₹1,000 crore. It holds ₹40 crore of loans to a sovereign rated such that the risk weight is 150% and…
- Under the Basel framework's standardised approach to credit risk, which feature best describes how sovereign exposures are risk-weighted?