FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Measures of Financial Risk
Which statement about VaR as a risk measure is correct?
VaR identifies a loss level exceeded with a small probability but gives no information about how large losses could be beyond that level. Expected shortfall measures average tail loss, and VaR is not always subadditive.
- AVaR states a loss threshold but says nothing about the size of losses beyond itCorrect
- BVaR is always subadditive, so diversification can never increase it
- CVaR measures the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded
- DVaR at 99% over one day is always larger than VaR at 95% over ten days
Explanation
VaR gives only the quantile of the loss distribution, so tail severity beyond it is not captured; expected shortfall addresses that. VaR is not generally subadditive, and the expected loss beyond VaR is expected shortfall. The comparison of 99% one-day and 95% ten-day VaR depends on the data.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measures of Financial Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measures of Financial Risk questions
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of default within a year, with a loss of 100 on default and no loss otherwise. Using the 95% con…
- Why is VaR generally not regarded as a coherent spectral risk measure?
- A portfolio's loss distribution is approximated by these equally likely tail outcomes beyond the 95% VaR cutoff: losses of USD 6 million, 8 …
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of defaulting over one year, with a loss of USD 10 million on default and no loss otherwise. Usi…
- A risk manager estimates 95% VaR by historical simulation from n independent observations. Which change would be expected to reduce the stan…
- A spectral risk measure assigns weights to quantiles of the loss distribution. Which weighting function property is required for the measure…