CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Economics and Management
Decision-making - Types and Process: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Definition
- Decision-making = choosing the best alternative from two or more alternatives to achieve an objective
- Check for both elements: more than one alternative and a purpose.
- Key characteristics
- Choice + Goal-oriented + Mental process + Continuous + Pervasive + Dynamic + Commitment
- Use this list to match a statement to the correct feature.
- Decision vs action
- Decision = the choice made; Implementation = putting the choice into effect
- A decision is complete when the choice is made, not when it is carried out.
- Programmed vs non-programmed
- Programmed = repetitive + rule-based; Non-programmed = new + judgement-based
- The test is whether a ready procedure exists for the problem.
- Level-wise classification
- Strategic (top, long-term) → Tactical (middle, medium-term) → Operational (lower, short-term)
- Match the decision to the management level and time horizon.
- Who decides
- Individual = one person, faster; Group = many people, slower but wider views
- Group decisions usually gain acceptance and diverse input but cost time.
- Routine vs basic
- Routine = frequent, minor, procedure-based; Basic = rare, major, long-term commitment
- Basic decisions are hard to reverse and need careful study.
- Sequence of the decision-making process
- Identify problem → Gather information → Develop alternatives → Evaluate alternatives → Select best alternative → Implement → Follow up / evaluate
- Wording and the number of steps vary by book. The order stays the same. Follow-up always comes last.
- Problem as a gap
- Problem = Desired position − Actual position
- A problem exists only when there is a gap between what should be and what is.
- Rational decision-making assumption
- Clear problem + known alternatives + clear criteria → choose the alternative with the best result
- Rational decisions assume complete information and an objective manager. Real life often falls short of this.
- Expected value (decision under risk)
- EV = Σ (probability × payoff)
- Probabilities of all outcomes for an alternative must add up to 1. Choose the alternative with the highest EV if payoffs are profits, or the lowest if payoffs are costs.
- Maximax (optimistic) criterion
- Pick the alternative whose best payoff is the highest
- Used under uncertainty by an optimistic decision-maker.
- Maximin (Wald, pessimistic) criterion
- Pick the alternative whose worst payoff is the highest
- Used under uncertainty by a cautious decision-maker.
- Minimax regret (Savage) criterion
- Regret = best payoff in that state − payoff of the alternative; pick the alternative with the smallest maximum regret
- Regret is worked out column by column (state by state).
- Laplace (equal probability) criterion
- Average payoff = sum of payoffs ÷ number of states; pick the highest average
- Treats all states as equally likely when no probabilities are known.
- Hurwicz criterion
- Weighted value = α × best payoff + (1 − α) × worst payoff
- α is the coefficient of optimism, between 0 and 1. Pick the highest weighted value.
- Expected value at a chance node
- EV = Σ (probability × payoff)
- Probabilities at one chance node must add up to 1. Use net payoff if a cost is involved.
- Decision tree rule
- Choose the branch with the highest expected value (net of cost)
- If the payoffs are costs, choose the lowest expected cost instead.
- Rational model vs bounded rationality
- Rational = optimising (best option); Bounded = satisficing (good enough option)
- This contrast is the most common MCQ pair.
- Brainstorming vs Delphi
- Brainstorming = face-to-face, ideas, no criticism; Delphi = experts, remote, anonymous, repeated rounds
- Use the meeting and anonymity cues to separate them.
- Value of extra information
- Collect more information only if expected benefit > cost of collecting it
- A practical rule, not a numeric formula. It explains why decisions are often taken with incomplete data.
- Bounded rationality (satisficing)
- Decision maker chooses a satisfactory option, not the best option
- Idea linked to Herbert Simon. Remember the words: limited information, limited ability, limited time.
- Four groups of limitations
- Information + Resources (time, cost) + Human (bias, ability) + Organisational (policy, politics, structure)
- Use this to classify any factor named in a question.
Quick revision
- A decision is a choice among alternatives; if there is only one option, there is no decision to make.
- Decision-making is a continuous, goal-directed process that involves a choice and a commitment to act.
- Programmed decisions are routine and rule-based; non-programmed decisions are new, unstructured and need judgement.
- Strategic decisions are long-term and made by top management; operational decisions are day-to-day and made at lower levels.
- Remember the steps of the process in order: identify the problem, gather information, develop alternatives, evaluate, choose, implement, follow up.
- Follow-up and feedback is the step that checks whether the decision worked.
- Under certainty, outcomes are known; under risk, probabilities are known; under uncertainty, probabilities are not known.
- Match each technique to its condition before choosing an option in the exam.
- Barriers include lack of information, time pressure, personal bias and resistance to change.
- No negative marking applies, so attempt every question and eliminate options that use absolute words without support.
Common mistakes
- Treating a decision as the same as its implementation. Fix: Remember that the decision is the choice. Carrying it out is a later step.
- Saying decision-making is needed only at top management. Fix: Recall pervasiveness: supervisors and middle managers also decide, with different scope.
- Treating all important decisions as non-programmed. Fix: Ask whether a rule exists. A routine payroll run is important but programmed.
- Confusing tactical with operational decisions. Fix: Tactical is medium-term and departmental; operational is short-term and day-to-day.
- Putting selection of the best alternative before evaluation. Fix: Remember that you cannot choose until alternatives are compared. Evaluate first, then select.
- Treating the decision as complete once the choice is made. Fix: Implementation and follow-up are still part of the process. A decision is judged by its results.
- Calling a decision 'uncertain' just because the future is unknown. Fix: In this topic, risk means probabilities are known and uncertainty means they are not. Check for probabilities.
- Using expected value when no probabilities are given. Fix: Without probabilities, use maximax, maximin, regret, Laplace or Hurwicz, as the question directs.
- Treating bounded rationality as irrational decision-making. Fix: Remember that the manager is still rational, but within limits of information, time and ability. The result is a satisfactory choice.
- Mixing up brainstorming and the Delphi technique. Fix: Brainstorming is a live meeting with free ideas. Delphi uses anonymous experts who never meet and answer in rounds.
Exam tips
- Learn the characteristic list as clue words, because most MCQs describe a situation and ask which feature it shows.
- Watch for options that confuse decision with plan or implementation.
- Be careful with absolute words such as 'only' and 'always' in statements about who decides.
- Link this topic to the types and steps of decisions, since questions often mix them.
- There is no negative marking, so always attempt every question after eliminating two options.
- Most questions give a short scenario. Spot the clue word first, then pick the type.
- Know the three level-wise types with their management level and time horizon; they are asked often.
- Learn one example for each type so you can recognise it in a different disguise.