CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence
Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Repeated default (Sec 454A)
- Penalty for repeat default = 2 × penalty provided for that default
- Applies if the same person commits such default again within 3 years from the date of the order imposing the earlier penalty by the adjudicating officer or Regional Director.
- Lesser penalty (Sec 446B)
- Penalty ≤ ½ × penalty specified, capped at ₹2,00,000 (company) and ₹1,00,000 (officer in default or other person)
- Applies to One Person Company, small company, start-up company and Producer Company, where a penalty is payable. The words are 'not more than one-half'.
- Adjudication appeal (Sec 454)
- Appeal to Regional Director within 60 days of receiving the order
- The adjudicating officer must give a reasonable opportunity of being heard before imposing any penalty.
- Non-compliance with adjudication order (Sec 454(8))
- Company: fine ₹25,000 to ₹5,00,000. Officer or other person in default: imprisonment up to 6 months, or fine ₹25,000 to ₹1,00,000, or both
- Applies if the order under sub-section (3) or (7) is not complied with within 90 days of receiving its copy.
- Offences non-cognizable (Sec 439)
- Every offence is non-cognizable, except those in Sec 212(6)
- Court takes cognizance only on written complaint of the Registrar, a shareholder or member, or a person authorised by the Central Government. SEBI-authorised complaints are allowed for issue and transfer of securities and non-payment of dividend.
- Statement of affairs (Sec 274)
- File objections and statement of affairs within 30 days of the Tribunal's order; Tribunal may allow 30 more days
- Failure means forfeiting the right to oppose. Officers face imprisonment up to 6 months or fine ₹25,000 to ₹5,00,000, or both.
- Section 450: residual penalty
- Penalty = ₹10,000 + ₹1,000 per day after the first day of continuing contravention; maximum ₹2,00,000 (company) and ₹50,000 (officer in default or other person)
- Applies only when no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in the Act. It covers the company, every officer in default, or any other person.
- Section 447: punishment for fraud (amount at least ₹10 lakh or 1% of turnover, whichever is lower)
- Imprisonment: 6 months to 10 years; fine: not less than the amount involved, up to 3 times the amount involved
- If the fraud involves public interest, imprisonment is not less than 3 years. Fraud includes any act, omission, concealment or abuse of position done with intent to deceive, whether or not there is wrongful gain or loss.
- Section 447: lesser fraud
- Amount below the threshold and no public interest: imprisonment up to 5 years, or fine up to ₹50 lakh, or both
- The threshold is ₹10 lakh or 1% of turnover, whichever is lower.
- Section 441: compounding
- Compounded by the Tribunal; or by the Regional Director or authorised officer if the maximum fine does not exceed ₹25 lakh
- The sum specified cannot exceed the maximum fine for the offence. Offences punishable with imprisonment only, or with imprisonment and also with fine, are not compoundable.
- Section 441(2): repeat offence
- No compounding of a similar offence within 3 years of the earlier compounding
- An offence after 3 years is treated as a first offence. Intimation of compounding goes to the Registrar within 7 days.
- Section 446B: lesser penalty
- Penalty ≤ ½ of the specified penalty, subject to a maximum of ₹2,00,000 (company) and ₹1,00,000 (officer in default or other person)
- Applies to One Person Companies, small companies, start-up companies and Producer Companies.
- Section 92(5): annual return default
- ₹10,000 + ₹100 per day of continuing failure; maximum ₹2,00,000 (company) and ₹50,000 (officer in default)
- A specific penalty, so section 450 does not apply to it.
- Lesser penalty rule
- Penalty under 446B ≤ ½ × penalty specified in the provision
- Applies to penalty (not imprisonment) for non-compliance of a provision of the Act. The words are "not more than one-half", so it is a ceiling.
- Cap for the company
- Maximum = ₹2,00,000
- Applies to the covered company itself, after halving.
- Cap for officer in default or other person
- Maximum = ₹1,00,000
- Applies to each officer in default or any other person in respect of the company.
- Covered entities
- OPC | small company | start-up company | Producer Company
- A company outside these four types gets no relief under this section.
- Start-up company test
- Private company + incorporated under 2013 Act or 1956 Act + recognised as start-up by DPIIT notification
- From the Explanation to the section.
- Appointment of adjudicating officers (s.454(1)-(2))
- Central Government order in Official Gazette; officers not below rank of Registrar; jurisdiction specified
- Appointment is by the Central Government, not by the Tribunal or the Registrar of Companies on its own.
- Powers of adjudicating officer (s.454(3))
- Impose penalty on company, officer in default or any other person + direct rectification where he considers fit
- The order must state the non-compliance or default.
- Proviso for s.92(4) and s.137(1)/(2) defaults
- Default rectified before, or within 30 days of, issue of notice → no penalty; proceedings deemed concluded
- Applies only to annual return filing (s.92(4)) and financial statement filing (s.137(1) or (2)) defaults.
- Hearing (s.454(4))
- Reasonable opportunity of being heard before imposing any penalty
- Must be given to the company, the officer in default or any other person concerned.
- Appeal (s.454(5)-(7))
- Appeal to Regional Director within 60 days from receipt of copy of order
- Regional Director may confirm, modify or set aside after hearing the parties.
- Non-compliance with order (s.454(8))
- Company: fine ₹25,000 to ₹5,00,000. Officer or other person: imprisonment up to 6 months or fine ₹25,000 to ₹1,00,000, or both
- Applies if the order under (3) or (7) is not complied with within 90 days of receipt of the copy.
- Repeated default (s.454A)
- Same default again within 3 years of the order → twice the penalty
- The three years run from the date of the order of the adjudicating officer or Regional Director.
- Section 435(1): Establishment
- Central Government may establish or designate Special Courts for offences under the Act, except under Section 452
- The purpose is speedy trial.
- Section 435(2): Composition
- Imprisonment of 2 years or more → Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge; other offences → Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the First Class
- Magistrate is appointed by the Central Government with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court.
- Section 436(1)(a): Territorial jurisdiction
- Triable by the Special Court for the area of the company's registered office
- If there are several, the High Court specifies one.
- Section 436(1)(b): Detention by Magistrate
- Judicial Magistrate: up to 15 days in the whole; Executive Magistrate: up to 7 days in the whole
- Then the accused is forwarded to the Special Court.
- Section 436(3): Summary trial
- Offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years → may be tried summarily; sentence cannot exceed 1 year
- If a longer sentence may be needed, the court records an order, recalls witnesses and holds a regular trial.
- Section 439(1): Nature of offences
- Every offence is non-cognizable, except those in Section 212(6)
- Applies notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
- Section 439(2): Cognizance
- Only on written complaint of the Registrar, a shareholder or member, or a person authorised by the Central Government
- SEBI-authorised person may complain for offences on issue and transfer of securities and non-payment of dividend. Not applicable to a prosecution by a company of its officers.
- Section 440: Transitional
- Until a Special Court exists → Court of Session, Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the First Class
- High Court may transfer cases under section 407 of the Code.
- Section 424: Tribunal procedure
- Not bound by CPC, 1908; guided by natural justice; powers of a civil court on listed matters
- Orders are enforced as a decree; proceedings are judicial proceedings.
- Offences that can be compounded
- Compoundable = offence NOT punishable with imprisonment only, and NOT with imprisonment and also fine
- Section 441(1) and 441(6). Fine-only offences, and those where the punishment is imprisonment or fine, qualify.
- Who compounds
- Tribunal: any compoundable offence. Regional Director / authorised officer: maximum fine ≤ ₹25 lakh
- Section 441(1)(a) and (b). The Regional Director is an officer appointed by the Central Government.
- Cap on the compounding sum
- Sum specified ≤ maximum fine for the offence
- First proviso to section 441(1). Additional fee paid under section 403(2) is taken into account.
- No compounding during investigation
- Investigation initiated or pending under the Act ⇒ no compounding
- Third proviso to section 441(1).
- Three-year bar
- Similar offence within 3 years of earlier compounding ⇒ cannot compound
- Section 441(2). An offence after three years from the earlier compounding is deemed a first offence.
- Application route
- Application → Registrar → (with comments) → Tribunal / Regional Director
- Section 441(3)(a).
- Intimation after compounding
- Company informs Registrar within 7 days of compounding
- Section 441(3)(b).
- Effect of compounding
- Before prosecution: no prosecution. After prosecution: Registrar tells court; offender discharged
- Section 441(3)(c) and (d).
- Non-compliance with filing direction
- Maximum fine becomes twice the amount in the section creating the offence
- Section 441(5), where an officer or employee fails to obey an order under 441(4).
- Condonation of delay
- Central Government may condone delay, for reasons recorded in writing
- Section 460(a): late application to the Central Government. Section 460(b): late filing with the Registrar.
Quick revision
- Flow: default, consequence, forum, remedy.
- Section 446B covers One Person Companies, small companies, start-up companies and Producer Companies.
- Under Section 446B, the penalty is not more than one-half of the specified penalty.
- Section 446B caps: ₹2,00,000 for a company and ₹1,00,000 for an officer in default or any other person.
- Section 454: the Central Government appoints adjudicating officers not below the rank of Registrar.
- The adjudicating officer must give a reasonable opportunity of being heard before imposing a penalty.
- Appeal against an adjudicating officer's order goes to the Regional Director, within sixty days of receiving the order.
- The Regional Director may confirm, modify or set aside the order appealed against.
- Failure to comply with the order within ninety days attracts a fine for the company of ₹25,000 to ₹5,00,000.
- For an officer or other person in default, the same failure attracts imprisonment up to six months, or fine of ₹25,000 to ₹1,00,000, or both.
- Section 435: Special Courts are established; a Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge sits for offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more.
- Section 436: a Special Court may try in a summary way offences punishable with imprisonment up to three years, but cannot sentence beyond one year in that trial.
Common mistakes
- Treating penalty and fine as the same thing. Fix: Penalty comes through adjudication by an officer of Registrar rank or above. Fine and imprisonment come from a court. Use the section's own wording.
- Making only the company liable. Fix: Check the section for 'officer who is in default'. Most provisions name both, as in section 178(8).
- Applying section 450 when the provision already has its own penalty, such as section 92(5). Fix: Read the provision first. Section 450 applies only if no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere.
- Charging the daily amount from day one. Fix: The base sum covers day one. Daily amounts start from day two, so multiply by (days − 1).
- Applying section 446B to every private company. Fix: Only OPCs, small companies, start-up companies and Producer Companies qualify. Check the type first.
- Writing that the penalty is exactly half. Fix: The section says "not more than one-half". Write that the penalty is limited to half, subject to the cap.
- Saying the appeal lies to the NCLT Fix: Under s.454(5), the appeal against an adjudicating officer's order goes to the Regional Director.
- Writing the appeal period as 30 days or 90 days Fix: Remember: appeal 60 days; no-penalty rectification window 30 days from notice; compliance with order 90 days.
- Saying any person can file a complaint for an offence under the Act. Fix: Section 439(2) limits complaints to the Registrar, a shareholder or member, or a person authorised by the Central Government. SEBI-authorised persons fit only the provisos.
- Treating offences under Section 452 as triable by Special Courts. Fix: Section 435(1) excludes offences under Section 452.
Exam tips
- Start every answer with the provision breached. The paper rewards provision, analysis, conclusion.
- Name both the company and the officer in default, with separate amounts.
- Use the exact section wording: penalty, fine, imprisonment. Do not interchange them.
- For small companies, OPCs, start-ups or Producer Companies, always test Sec 446B.
- Show date arithmetic for three-year or 60-day and 90-day periods.
- Begin every answer by stating whether the provision has its own penalty. This decides whether section 450 applies.
- Write the numbers in a short working line: base, daily sum, days, cap. Marks are given for method.
- In fraud questions, quote the test of ₹10 lakh or 1% of turnover, whichever is lower, and check public interest.