CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances
Appearance before other Regulatory and Quasi-judicial Authorities: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Section 7: financial creditor
- Default occurred → application (alone or jointly) → record of default (information utility or other evidence) + name of proposed IRP + other specified information → AA ascertains default within 14 days
- Admit if default has occurred, application is complete and no disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed RP. Otherwise reject, after a 7-day notice to rectify.
- Section 7: threshold for class creditors and allottees
- Not less than 100 creditors or 10% of the class/project, whichever is less
- Applies to financial creditors in the class under Section 21(6A)(a) and (b), and to allottees of the same real estate project, who must file jointly.
- Section 7: communication
- Order communicated within 7 days of admission or rejection
- Admission order goes to financial creditor and corporate debtor. Rejection order goes to the financial creditor only.
- Section 9: operational creditor
- Demand notice/invoice (Section 8) → wait 10 days from delivery → no payment and no dispute notice → file application
- Admission or rejection by the AA within 14 days of receipt of the application.
- Section 9(3): documents
- Invoice or demand notice copy + affidavit of no dispute notice + bank certificate (if available) + information utility record (if available) + other proof
- The operational creditor may propose an RP to act as interim resolution professional.
- Section 9(5): grounds for rejection
- Incomplete application | payment made | no invoice/notice delivered | dispute notice or record of dispute | disciplinary proceeding pending against proposed RP
- Notice to rectify within 7 days is required only before rejecting for incompleteness under clause (ii)(a).
- Section 10: corporate applicant
- Default by corporate debtor → application with books of account + proposed IRP + special resolution of shareholders (or resolution of at least three-fourths of partners)
- AA must admit or reject within 14 days of receipt. Admit if complete and no disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed RP. Reject if incomplete or if one is pending.
- Commencement
- CIRP commences from the date of admission
- Stated in Sections 7(6), 9(6) and 10(5).
- Section 54B: pre-packaged process
- IP proposed as RP prepares a report on whether the debtor meets Section 54A and the base resolution plan conforms to Section 54A(4)(c)
- Duty begins on approval under Section 54A(2)(e). It ceases if the debtor fails to file in time or the application is admitted or rejected. Fees form part of pre-pack costs if admitted.
- Core duty (Section 25(1))
- RP's duty = preserve and protect assets + continue business operations
- Quote this first in any answer. Section 25(2) actions are the means to achieve it.
- Actions in Section 25(2)
- (a) custody and control of assets and records; (b) represent the debtor; (c) interim finance with CoC approval; (d) appoint professionals; (e) updated list of claims; (f) convene and attend CoC meetings; (g) information memorandum; (h) invite resolution applicants; (i) present resolution plans to CoC; (j) avoidance applications; (k) other actions specified by the Board
- Eleven clauses, (a) to (k). Group them as assets, representation, finance, claims, CoC and plans.
- Interim finance
- IRP: Section 20(2)(c), security over encumbered property needs secured creditors' consent. RP: Section 25(2)(c), subject to CoC approval under Section 28
- Do not mix the two. The IRP's proviso waives consent where the property's value is at least twice the debt.
- RP takes IRP's role
- Section 23(2): RP exercises the powers and performs the duties of the IRP
- This is the base for IRP versus RP questions.
- Continuity of management
- Section 23(1) proviso: RP continues to manage operations after the CIRP period ends until an order under Section 31(1) or appointing a liquidator under Section 34
- Applies until the Adjudicating Authority passes the order.
- Who may appear (Section 35(1))
- Party or Director General → in person OR authorised CA / CS / CMA / legal practitioner / own officer
- Authorisation can be of one or more persons. Authorisation is by the party or the Director General.
- Condition for professionals
- CA, CS, CMA must hold a certificate of practice under section 6(1) of their respective Act
- A CS without a certificate of practice does not fit the definition in the Explanation.
- Legal practitioner
- Advocate, vakil or attorney of any High Court, including a pleader in practice
- Definition in clause (d) of the Explanation.
- Expert opinion (Section 35(2))
- Party may call experts from economics, commerce, international trade or any other discipline
- Inserted by Act 9 of 2023 w.e.f. 18-5-2023. It is without prejudice to sub-section (1).
- Commission's procedure (Section 36)
- Natural justice + own procedure + civil court powers (summons, documents, affidavit evidence, commissions)
- Section 36(3) separately lets the Commission call experts to assist its inquiry.
- General penalty cap (section 27(b))
- Penalty ≤ 10% of average turnover or income of the last three preceding financial years
- Applies to each person or enterprise party to the agreement or abusing dominance. Turnover means global turnover from all products and services.
- Cartel penalty (proviso to section 27(b))
- Up to the higher of: 3 × profit for each year of the agreement, or 10% of turnover or income for each year
- Applies to each producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider in the cartel.
- Dominant position (section 4 Explanation)
- Position of strength in the relevant market in India enabling independence from competitive forces or affecting competitors, consumers or the market in its favour
- Dominance itself is not an offence. Only its abuse is.
- Settlement window (section 48A)
- After receipt of DG report under section 26(4) and before the cut-off set by regulations before an order under section 27 or 28
- Available for section 3(4) and section 4 inquiries only. No appeal under section 53B against a settlement order. Amounts go to the Consolidated Fund of India.
- District Commission pecuniary limit (section 34)
- Value of goods or services paid as consideration ≤ ₹1 crore
- The Central Government may prescribe another value. Always say this proviso exists.
- State Commission pecuniary limit (section 47)
- ₹1 crore < consideration paid ≤ ₹10 crore
- Also hears complaints against unfair contracts where consideration does not exceed ₹10 crore, and appeals from District Commissions in the State.
- National Commission pecuniary limit (section 58)
- Consideration paid > ₹10 crore
- Also hears complaints against unfair contracts above ₹10 crore, appeals against State Commission orders and appeals against Central Authority orders.
- Territorial jurisdiction (sections 34(2) and 47(4))
- Where opposite party resides, carries on business, has a branch office or works for gain; or where cause of action arises wholly or in part; or where complainant resides or personally works for gain
- If there are several opposite parties, each must reside or work there, or any one can be used with the Commission's permission.
- Complaints to authorities (section 17)
- Class-wide complaint → District Collector, regional Commissioner or Central Authority
- May be in writing or in electronic mode. Covers consumer rights violations, unfair trade practices and misleading advertisements prejudicial to consumers as a class.
- Directions on a misleading advertisement (Section 21(1))
- Investigation → advertisement false or misleading and prejudicial to consumers → order to discontinue or modify, within a specified time
- Directions can go to the trader, manufacturer, endorser, advertiser or publisher.
- Penalty on manufacturer or endorser (Section 21(2))
- First contravention: up to ₹10,00,000. Each subsequent contravention: up to ₹50,00,000
- These are maximum limits. The Authority must first think a penalty is necessary.
- Prohibition on endorser (Section 21(3))
- First: up to 1 year. Each subsequent contravention: up to 3 years
- It bars endorsing any product or service for that period.
- Penalty on publisher or party to publication (Section 21(4))
- Up to ₹10,00,000
- Applies to a person who publishes, or is a party to publishing, a misleading advertisement.
- Endorser defence (Section 21(5))
- No penalty under Section 21(2) and (3) if due diligence was exercised to verify the claims
- Due diligence protects only against those two sub-sections.
- Ordinary course of business defence (Section 21(6))
- No penalty if the advertisement was published or arranged in the ordinary course of business
- Not available if the person knew of the Authority's earlier order for withdrawal or modification.
- Factors for fixing penalty (Section 21(7))
- Population and area affected; frequency and duration; vulnerability of the class affected; gross revenue from sales due to the offence
- Remember as four factors.
- Hearing (Section 21(8))
- Opportunity of being heard before any order under Section 21
- Natural justice is mandatory.
Quick revision
- Section 25 IBC: the resolution professional must preserve and protect the corporate debtor's assets, including continued business operations.
- Under section 25, the resolution professional takes immediate custody and control of assets and business records.
- The resolution professional raises interim finances only with the committee of creditors' approval under section 28.
- The resolution professional prepares the information memorandum under section 29 and presents all resolution plans to the committee of creditors.
- Section 31 IBC: an approved plan binds the corporate debtor, employees, members, creditors, the Central and State Governments, local authorities, guarantors and other stakeholders.
- After approval under section 31, the moratorium ceases and the resolution professional forwards records to the Board.
- Section 31(4): the resolution applicant must obtain necessary approvals within one year of approval, or the period in the relevant law, whichever is later.
- Proviso to section 31(4): if a plan contains a combination, CCI approval is needed before the committee of creditors approves the plan.
- Section 54B: the insolvency professional first reports on whether the debtor meets section 54A and whether the base plan conforms.
- Section 54F: the resolution professional in the pre-packaged process confirms the list of claims and monitors management of the debtor.
- Section 35 Competition Act: a party or the Director General may appear in person or authorise a chartered accountant, company secretary, cost accountant, legal practitioner or an officer.
- Section 35(2): a party may call experts from fields such as economics, commerce or international trade to give an expert opinion.
Common mistakes
- Saying CIRP starts on the date of filing. Fix: State that CIRP commences from the date of admission under Sections 7(6), 9(6) and 10(5).
- Giving the 7-day rectification notice for every rejection ground under Section 9. Fix: Under Section 9 the notice is tied to rejection for an incomplete application, clause (ii)(a). A paid debt or a dispute notice cannot be cured by rectification. Sections 7 and 10 require the notice before rejection generally.
- Treating Section 25 as the section on the IRP's duties. Fix: Section 18 is the IRP's duties, Section 20 the IRP's going concern powers, Section 25 the RP's duties.
- Saying the RP can raise interim finance without anyone's approval. Fix: Section 25(2)(c) makes the RP's interim finance subject to CoC approval under Section 28.
- Saying any company secretary can appear before the CCI. Fix: Add that the CS must hold a certificate of practice under section 6(1) of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980.
- Writing that only advocates may appear. Fix: Quote the full list, including CAs, CSs, cost accountants and the party's own officers.
- Treating dominance as illegal in itself. Fix: Write that only abuse of dominant position is prohibited, and then match the conduct to section 4(2).
- Applying the 10% cap to cartels without the proviso. Fix: For cartels, state up to three times profit per year or 10% of turnover per year, whichever is higher.
- Deciding the forum by the compensation claimed. Fix: Use only the value of goods or services paid as consideration. Say so in your answer.
- Putting exactly ₹1 crore or exactly ₹10 crore in the wrong tier. Fix: Consideration up to and including ₹1 crore is District. Above ₹1 crore up to and including ₹10 crore is State. Above ₹10 crore is National.
Exam tips
- Start every answer with the section and the type of applicant. Examiners reward correct identification first.
- Quote the numbers exactly: 14 days, 7 days, 10 days, 100 creditors or 10%. Do not mix them. Remember that the 14 days in Section 7 is for ascertaining default, while in Sections 9 and 10 it is for admitting or rejecting.
- Always address the proposed resolution professional and any pending disciplinary proceeding, because it is a ground for rejection in Sections 7, 9 and 10.
- Remember the rectification notice: in Section 9 it is given only before rejecting for incompleteness, whereas Sections 7 and 10 give notice before rejection generally.
- In drafting questions, list the annexures required under the relevant section: the resolution under Section 10, the record of default under Section 7, and the affidavit under Section 9.
- Finish with the conclusion and the date CIRP commences. Briefly mention the appeal to NCLAT if the question asks about remedies.
- Begin with Section 25(1) in your own words. Examiners look for the purpose first, then the list.
- Cite clause numbers from Section 25(2) next to each duty. Do this only for clauses you are sure of.