CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning
Inspection, Search, Seizure, Offences and Penalties: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Who can authorise
- Proper officer not below Joint Commissioner, with reasons to believe, authorises in writing any other officer of central tax
- Applies to inspection under s.67(1) and search and seizure under s.67(2). He may also search and seize himself under s.67(2).
- Trigger for inspection
- Reason to believe: (a) suppression, excess ITC or contravention to evade tax by a taxable person; or (b) transporter/warehouse keeper holds goods that escaped tax or keeps accounts or goods so as to cause evasion
- Inspection is of places of business of the taxable person, transporter, or owner/operator of warehouse, godown or other place.
- Trigger for search and seizure
- Reason to believe: goods liable to confiscation, or documents, books or things useful or relevant to proceedings, are secreted in any place
- Can follow an inspection or be independent of it.
- Return of documents
- Documents not relied upon for the notice: return within 30 days of issue of the notice
- Retention of seized documents is only as long as necessary for examination and inquiry or proceedings.
- Time limit for notice on seized goods
- No notice within 6 months of seizure → goods returned; extendable by proper officer for up to a further 6 months on sufficient cause
- Extension needs sufficient cause shown. The total cannot go beyond twelve months.
- Provisional release
- Seized goods released on bond and security as prescribed, or on payment of applicable tax, interest and penalty
- Manner and quantum of bond and security are prescribed in the rules.
- Seizure of documents produced before officer
- Reason to believe person evaded or is attempting to evade tax → seize accounts, registers or documents produced before him, for reasons recorded in writing, with a receipt
- Retained as long as necessary for proceedings or prosecution.
- Who authorises arrest
- Commissioner's order → authorised central tax officer arrests (s. 69(1))
- Needs reasons to believe an offence in s. 132(1)(a)-(d) punishable under clause (i) or (ii), or s. 132(2).
- Arrest thresholds
- Clause (i): amount > ₹5 crore. Clause (ii): > ₹2 crore up to ₹5 crore
- Amount means tax evaded, ITC wrongly availed or utilised, or refund wrongly taken. Five hundred lakh rupees = ₹5 crore.
- Default status of offences
- All offences: non-cognizable and bailable (s. 132(4))
- Subject to the exception in s. 132(5).
- Exception
- s. 132(1)(a)/(b)/(c)/(d) punishable under clause (i) (> ₹5 crore) = cognizable and non-bailable (s. 132(5))
- Only these four clauses, only in the highest tier.
- Production before Magistrate
- Arrest for s. 132(5) offence: inform grounds + produce before Magistrate within 24 hours (s. 69(2))
- Applies to the cognizable, non-bailable category.
- Bail position
- Arrest for s. 132(4) offence: admit to bail, or forward to Magistrate's custody (s. 69(3)(a))
- Subject to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
- Summons duty
- Summoned person must attend in person or by authorised representative and state the truth (s. 70(1A))
- Inquiry is a judicial proceeding under IPC sections 193 and 228 (s. 70(2)).
- Sanction
- No prosecution without previous sanction of the Commissioner (s. 132(6))
- Prosecution is separate from arrest.
- Section 71(1): who may access
- Officer authorised by proper officer (not below Joint Commissioner) → access to any place of business of a registered person
- Purpose: audit, scrutiny, verification and checks to safeguard revenue. No 'reason to believe' is required.
- Section 71(2): time to produce records
- Records must be made available within a period not exceeding 15 working days from the demand, or further period allowed
- The further period is allowed by the officer, audit party or nominated accountant. The duty falls on the person in charge of the place.
- Section 71(2): records that may be demanded
- Declared records; trial balance or equivalent; audited annual accounts (where required); cost audit report (s.148 Companies Act, 2013); income-tax audit report (s.44AB, Income-tax Act, 1961); any other relevant record
- Learn the six items as a list. The cost audit and tax audit reports apply only 'if any'.
- Section 68: goods in movement
- Conveyance carrying consignment above specified value → carry prescribed documents and devices; on interception → produce them and allow inspection of goods
- The value limit is as specified by the Government. Documents are validated in the prescribed manner.
- Section 72: assistance
- Police, Railways, Customs, land revenue officers (including village officers), State tax and UT tax officers must assist proper officers; other classes by notification when called upon by the Commissioner
- The first group is named in the Act. Others need a notification.
- Punishment above ₹500 lakh
- Tax evaded / ITC wrongly availed or utilised / refund wrongly taken > ₹500 lakh → imprisonment up to 5 years and fine
- Section 132(1)(i). Offences under clauses (a) to (d) at this level are cognizable and non-bailable.
- Punishment above ₹200 lakh up to ₹500 lakh
- ₹200 lakh < amount ≤ ₹500 lakh → imprisonment up to 3 years and fine
- Section 132(1)(ii).
- Punishment above ₹100 lakh up to ₹200 lakh
- ₹100 lakh < amount ≤ ₹200 lakh → imprisonment up to 1 year and fine
- Section 132(1)(iii). Applies only to an offence under clause (b).
- False records or information
- Clause (f) → imprisonment up to 6 months or fine or both
- Section 132(1)(iv).
- Repeat conviction and minimum term
- Second or later conviction → up to 5 years and fine; minimum 6 months unless special and adequate reasons are recorded
- Section 132(2) and (3). The minimum applies to clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and sub-section (2).
- Cognizable and non-bailable offences
- Clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) punishable under clause (i) → cognizable, non-bailable; all others → non-cognizable, bailable
- Section 132(4) and (5).
- Compounding amount
- Minimum 25% of tax involved; maximum 100% of tax involved
- Section 138(2). Tax, interest and penalty must be paid first.
- Section 125 general penalty
- Penalty may extend to ₹25,000
- Applies only where no penalty is separately provided in the Act. It is a ceiling ('may extend'), not a fixed amount.
- Section 122(1) offence penalty
- Higher of ₹10,000 and the tax evaded / tax not deducted or collected / ITC availed or passed on / refund claimed
- Applies to a taxable person committing any of the listed offences (i) to (xxi).
- Section 122(1A) beneficiary penalty
- Penalty = tax evaded or ITC availed or passed on
- On a person who retains the benefit of a transaction under clause (i), (ii), (vii) or (ix) and at whose instance it was conducted.
- Section 122(1B) e-commerce operator
- Higher of ₹10,000 and the tax involved had the supply been made by a registered person (other than a section 10 person)
- For an operator liable to collect TCS who allows supply by an unregistered or ineligible person, or gives wrong details in the section 52(4) statement.
- Section 122(2)(a): non-fraud
- Higher of ₹10,000 and 10% of tax due
- Registered person; tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or ITC wrongly availed or utilised.
- Section 122(2)(b): fraud
- Higher of ₹10,000 and 100% of tax due
- Where the reason is fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax.
- Section 122(3) penalty
- May extend to ₹25,000
- Aiding or abetting, dealing in goods liable to confiscation, not appearing on summons, not issuing or accounting for an invoice.
- Section 73 order penalty
- Higher of 10% of tax and ₹10,000
- Determined with tax and interest in the order under section 73(9).
- Section 73 time limits
- Notice at least 3 months before the order deadline; order within 3 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant year (or from the date of erroneous refund)
- Applies to periods up to FY 2023-24.
- Section 73 nil-penalty payment
- Pay tax + interest within 30 days of the show cause notice: no penalty, proceedings concluded
- Exception: self-assessed tax or tax collected but not paid within 30 days of its due date still attracts the penalty.
- Payment before notice
- Pay tax + interest on own or officer's ascertainment before notice: no notice or penalty for that tax
- If the officer finds a shortfall, a notice is issued for the shortfall only.
- Cap on redemption fine (s.130(2), first proviso)
- Fine ≤ Market value of goods − Tax chargeable on them
- This is only the upper limit. The officer fixes the actual fine within it.
- Floor on fine plus penalty (s.130(2), second proviso)
- Fine + Penalty ≥ 100% of tax payable on such goods
- The test is on the aggregate of fine and penalty, not on the fine alone.
- Redemption of a conveyance used for hire
- Fine = Tax payable on the goods being transported
- Applies where the conveyance carries goods or passengers for hire. The owner gets the option to pay this fine.
- Hearing requirement (s.130(4))
- No confiscation or penalty order without an opportunity of being heard
- An order passed without a hearing is open to challenge.
- Vesting and disposal (s.130(5)-(7))
- Title vests in Government; disposal only after up to 3 months to pay fine
- The officer must be satisfied the goods are not needed in other proceedings under the Act.
Quick revision
- Section 67 inspection and search need a proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, who must have reasons to believe.
- Authorisation to inspect or search is given in writing to another officer of central tax.
- Seized documents are kept only as long as necessary for examination and proceedings.
- Documents not relied upon for a notice must be returned within thirty days of the notice being issued.
- Where seizure is not practicable, the officer can order the owner not to remove or deal with the goods without permission.
- Seized goods can be released provisionally on a bond and security, or on payment of tax, interest and penalty.
- If no notice is given within six months of seizure, goods are returned; the period can be extended by up to six more months for sufficient cause.
- The person from whom documents are seized may make copies or extracts in the presence of an authorised officer, unless this would prejudice the investigation.
- Section 70 summons: the proper officer has civil court powers, and the inquiry is a judicial proceeding.
- Section 71: access to business premises is by an officer authorised by an officer not below Joint Commissioner, and records must be made available within fifteen working days of demand, unless further time is allowed.
- Section 69 arrest is authorised by the Commissioner by order, when he has reasons to believe a specified offence is committed.
- Section 20 of the IGST Act applies these CGST provisions to integrated tax mutatis mutandis.
Common mistakes
- Treating inspection and search as the same power. Fix: Inspection is entry to places of business on belief of evasion. Search and seizure needs belief that goods or documents are secreted, and allows seizing.
- Saying any GST officer can order a search. Fix: Only a proper officer not below Joint Commissioner forms the belief and authorises in writing. The authorised officer then acts.
- Saying every GST offence is cognizable and non-bailable. Fix: Remember the default: non-cognizable and bailable. Only clauses (a)-(d) in the above ₹5 crore tier are cognizable and non-bailable.
- Saying any GST officer can arrest on his own. Fix: Arrest needs the Commissioner's order authorising a central tax officer, based on reasons to believe.
- Saying section 71 needs a reason to believe that tax has been evaded. Fix: Section 71 is for audit, scrutiny, verification and checks to safeguard revenue. Reason to believe is a section 67 test.
- Stating the wrong time limit for producing records. Fix: Section 71(2) gives a period not exceeding fifteen working days from the demand, extendable by the officer, audit party or accountant.
- Treating the lowest slab as applying to every offence Fix: Remember that the ₹100 to ₹200 lakh slab is only for clause (b). Other offences in that range are not covered by that slab.
- Saying all GST offences are non-bailable Fix: Only clauses (a) to (d) punishable under clause (i), above ₹500 lakh, are cognizable and non-bailable. The rest are non-cognizable and bailable.
- Applying 10% of tax without checking the ₹10,000 floor. Fix: Always compute both figures and write the higher one. On tax of ₹60,000, 10% is ₹6,000, so the penalty is ₹10,000.
- Treating section 125 as the main penalty section. Fix: Use it only when no penalty is separately provided. Check sections 122 and 73 first.
Exam tips
- Begin every answer by naming the authority: not below Joint Commissioner, in writing.
- Quote the exact trigger phrase, reasons to believe, and link it to the facts.
- Keep the six-month and thirty-day limits separate and state the extension.
- Show a clear conclusion on validity, since case answers are marked on analysis and conclusion.
- Mention the break-open power and receipt for seized documents when facts show denied access.
- Write the section number with every statement: 69 for arrest, 70 for summons, 132(4) and 132(5) for cognizable status.
- Always compute the amount tier before answering. Examiners build facts around the ₹2 crore and ₹5 crore limits.
- Use the structure provision, facts, conclusion. Keep the conclusion to a line.